| Literature DB >> 3812785 |
W A Hargreaves, M Shumway, E J Knutsen, A Weinstein, N Senter.
Abstract
The Jamison-Farabee consent decree in California mandates an outside psychiatrist's review of involuntary medication of state hospital patients. Patients' rights advocates presumably hoped the decree would facilitate more frequent medication refusal, while clinicians predicted the procedure would impair patient care. Outside review led to only a 1.1% rate of medication denial; half of the patients involved deteriorated afterward. Examination of a sample of patients subject to the decree and two comparable samples 1 year and 10 years earlier suggests that patients' successful medication refusal was no more frequent after implementation of the decree and that the procedure had negligible effects on patient care or outcome for patients not denied medication.Entities:
Keywords: Empirical Approach; Jamison v. Farabee; Legal Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Napa State Hospital; Professional Patient Relationship
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1987 PMID: 3812785 DOI: 10.1176/ajp.144.2.188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Psychiatry ISSN: 0002-953X Impact factor: 18.112