Literature DB >> 3812785

Effects of the Jamison-Farabee consent decree: due process protection for involuntary psychiatric patients treated with psychoactive medication.

W A Hargreaves, M Shumway, E J Knutsen, A Weinstein, N Senter.   

Abstract

The Jamison-Farabee consent decree in California mandates an outside psychiatrist's review of involuntary medication of state hospital patients. Patients' rights advocates presumably hoped the decree would facilitate more frequent medication refusal, while clinicians predicted the procedure would impair patient care. Outside review led to only a 1.1% rate of medication denial; half of the patients involved deteriorated afterward. Examination of a sample of patients subject to the decree and two comparable samples 1 year and 10 years earlier suggests that patients' successful medication refusal was no more frequent after implementation of the decree and that the procedure had negligible effects on patient care or outcome for patients not denied medication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Jamison v. Farabee; Legal Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Napa State Hospital; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3812785     DOI: 10.1176/ajp.144.2.188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  1 in total

1.  Effects of fiscal retrenchment on public mental health services for the chronic mentally ill.

Authors:  R W Surber; M Shumway; R Shadoan; W A Hargreaves
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1986
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.