Literature DB >> 3810676

Lung cancer and passive smoking: association of an artefact due to misclassification of smoking habits?

P N Lee.   

Abstract

1775 subjects were asked about their current use of tobacco products or nicotine chewing gum. 1537 provided a sample of saliva for cotinine analysis. Of 808 who claimed not to be users of such products, 20 (2.5%) had cotinine values above 30 ng/ml, suggesting their self-reports were false. In another study, 540 subjects were interviewed on two occasions. 10% of subjects claiming on one occasion never to have smoked made inconsistent statements on the other occasion. A third study showed a strong tendency for smokers to marry smokers. Bias caused by misclassification of smoking habits coupled with between-spouse smoking habit concordance can completely explain reported apparent excesses in lung cancer risk in non-smokers married to smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3810676     DOI: 10.1016/0378-4274(87)90102-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  10 in total

1.  Quality of measurement of smoking status by self-report and saliva cotinine among pregnant women.

Authors:  N R Boyd; R A Windsor; L L Perkins; J B Lowe
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-06

2.  Relation between cotinine in the urine and indices based on self-declared smoking habits.

Authors:  Akiko Tsutsumi; Jun Kagawa; Yuko Yamano; Toshio Nakadate; Satoru Shimizu
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.674

3.  Japanese spousal smoking study revisited: how a tobacco industry funded paper reached erroneous conclusions.

Authors:  E Yano
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Survival following non-small cell lung cancer among Asian/Pacific Islander, Latina, and Non-Hispanic white women who have never smoked.

Authors:  Scarlett L Gomez; Ellen T Chang; Sarah J Shema; Kari Fish; Jennette D Sison; Peggy Reynolds; Christelle Clément-Duchêne; Margaret R Wrensch; John L Wiencke; Heather A Wakelee
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Challenging the epidemiologic evidence on passive smoking: tactics of tobacco industry expert witnesses.

Authors:  John A Francis; Amy K Shea; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  Lung cancer from passive smoking: hypothesis or convincing evidence?

Authors:  K Uberla
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  Why is environmental tobacco smoke more strongly associated with coronary heart disease than expected? A review of potential biases and experimental data.

Authors:  G Howard; M J Thun
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Risk of childhood cancer and adult lung cancer after childhood exposure to passive smoke: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  P Boffetta; J Trédaniel; A Greco
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  New Policy of the Journal of Epidemiology Regarding the Relationship With the Tobacco Industry.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Iso; Keitaro Matsuo; Kota Katanoda; Takeo Fujiwara
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.211

Review 10.  Secondhand smoke exposure and risk of lung cancer in Japan: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Megumi Hori; Hirokazu Tanaka; Kenji Wakai; Shizuka Sasazuki; Kota Katanoda
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.019

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.