Literature DB >> 3808744

Pain assessment with different intensity scales in response to loading of joint structures.

Karin Harms-Ringdahl1, Anna Maria Carlsson, Jan Ekholm, Anders Raustorp, Thomas Svensson, Hans-Göran Toresson.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to compare intensity levels assessed on Borg's Category Scale for Ratings of Perceived Pain (BRPP) (1982) (a verbal scale using adjectives and adverbs combined with the numbers 0-10), with assessments on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (a 10 cm horizontal line). Eight healthy subjects volunteered in an experimental study, where pain was provoked by load on passive soft tissue elbow joint structures. Each subject participated 4 times on different occasions in the same experimental set-up, which was divided into six 2 min periods; 3 periods with load induced by applied external weights causing load moments of 3.4 Nm, 4.5 Nm and 6.8 Nm plus that induced by the weight of the lower arm and hand (average 2.9 Nm), followed by 3 periods without external weights. Each series consisted of 12 assessments given during the last 10 sec period of each minute on either the BRPP or the VAS. No significant difference was found between the first and second time a scale was used by the same subject, and none between the assessments on the VAS and the BRPP. Intensity levels of pain increased with load and time and decreased after reduction of the load moments. It is concluded that both scales can be used to reliably assess intensity levels of perceived pain elicited by loading joint structures. Intensity levels, as assessed on both scales, are associated with applied external load and time for exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3808744     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90163-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  17 in total

1.  Comparison between the CR10 Borg's scale and the VAS (visual analogue scale) during an arm-cranking exercise.

Authors:  E M Capodaglio
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-06

Review 2.  Measuring pain in the clinic.

Authors:  R H Gracely
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1990 Mar-Jun

3.  Lower-order pain-related constructs are more predictive of cold pressor pain ratings than higher-order personality traits.

Authors:  Jennifer E Lee; David Watson; Laura A Frey Law
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.820

4.  Is posterior synovial plica excision necessary for refractory lateral epicondylitis of the elbow?

Authors:  In Hyeok Rhyou; Kang Wook Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The VISA-A questionnaire: a valid and reliable index of the clinical severity of Achilles tendinopathy.

Authors:  J M Robinson; J L Cook; C Purdam; P J Visentini; J Ross; N Maffulli; J E Taunton; K M Khan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 6.  Patellofemoral pain syndrome: a review of current issues.

Authors:  R Thomeé; J Augustsson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Low back pain in young female gymnasts and the effect of specific segmental muscle control exercises of the lumbar spine: a prospective controlled intervention study.

Authors:  M L Harringe; J S Nordgren; I Arvidsson; S Werner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Fibromyalgia: a time-series analysis of the stressor-physical symptom association.

Authors:  R L Hazlett; S N Haynes
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1992-12

9.  Validation and application of a subjective knee questionnaire.

Authors:  J Höher; A Münster; J Klein; E Eypasch; T Tiling
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot Study.

Authors:  Lisa Goudman; Julie Jansen; Nieke Vets; Ann De Smedt; Maarten Moens
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.