Literature DB >> 3806860

An overview of state medical discipline.

R P Kusserow, E A Handley, M R Yessian.   

Abstract

The Office of Inspector General's responsibility for financially penalizing and excluding health care professionals from Medicare and Medicaid participation led to an interest in examining the state medical boards' licensure and discipline processes. This article discusses the results of the subsequent study and focuses only on medical discipline issues. We found that the rate of disciplinary actions taken by boards has been increasing. However, revocations and suspensions, the most serious category of actions, have remained relatively constant. Additionally, consumers and law enforcement agencies are the most active sources of possible violations. Individual health care professionals, hospitals, peer review organizations, and medical societies provide strikingly few reports. To rectify these problems, we encourage states to increase physician license renewal fees to fund expansion and improvement of boards' enforcement activities and to consider ways to limit the legal liability of those making good-faith referrals.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3806860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  3 in total

1.  Five-year results of the peer assessment program of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

Authors:  R G McAuley; W M Paul; G H Morrison; R F Beckett; C H Goldsmith
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  On Patient Safety: How Can We Get More Nonphysicians on Medical Boards?

Authors:  James Rickert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Outcomes of notifications to health practitioner boards: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Matthew J Spittal; David M Studdert; Ron Paterson; Marie M Bismark
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 8.775

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.