Literature DB >> 3806485

How bad are medical records? A review of the notes received by a practice.

B G Mansfield.   

Abstract

One hundred and fifty-five medical records received by a practice as a result of transfer of care were examined. It was found that the marital status was recorded for 30% of patients aged over 16 years and the occupation noted for only 15% of patients of working age. Twentythree per cent of the notes included a summary of the patient's history and 39% contained an immunization record. Of the notes for women aged between 16 and 60 years 48% contained a recent cervical smear report. This percentage increased to 61% for women aged 35-60 years. Of the entries examined 86.2% were legible. It is concluded that either doctors do not know as much about their patients as they should or they attempt to carry too much information in their heads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3806485      PMCID: PMC1960522     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract        ISSN: 0035-8797


  2 in total

1.  Survey of general practice records.

Authors:  K S Dawes
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-07-22

2.  Practical problems of improving records.

Authors:  D Stuart
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-03-07
  2 in total
  5 in total

1.  Large computer databases in general practice.

Authors:  M Pringle; R Hobbs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-30

2.  Transfer of medical records.

Authors:  T F Dent
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-05

3.  Minimum data set necessary to promote the care of the elderly in general practice.

Authors:  S J Jachuck; J R Mulcahy
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-05

4.  To what extent do clinical notes by general practitioners reflect actual medical performance? A study using simulated patients.

Authors:  J J Rethans; E Martin; J Metsemakers
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Personal medical attendant reports.

Authors:  W Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.386

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.