Literature DB >> 3804906

Oral ciprofloxacin therapy of infection caused by multiply resistant bacteria other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

B E Scully, H C Neu.   

Abstract

Of 125 patients treated with ciprofloxacin at the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, 34 had infections due to bacteria other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The mean age of the patients was 50 years (19-88 years) and most had significant underlying disease. There were nine lower respiratory infections, eight urinary tract infections, eight soft tissue infections, three osteomyelitis, and three intra-abdominal infections. The pathogens were: Escherichia coli, 7 (mean MIC 0.07 mg/l); Serratia marcescens, 6 (0.2 mg/l); Enterobacter spp., 5 (0.1 mg/l); Klebsiella pneumoniae, 3 (0.1 mg/l); Proteus mirabilis, 3 (0.06 mg/l); Cutrobacter freundii, 2 (0.06 mg/l), Staphylococcus aureus, 3 (0.5 mg/l); and one each of Acinetobacter anitratus. Haemophilus, influenzae, Salmonella enteritidis, Flavobacterium meningosepticum, and Streptococcus faecalis. Of these organisms 81% were resistant to ampicillin, 70% to carbenicillin, 22% to gentamicin, 49% to cefazolin and cephalexin, and 25% to cotrimoxazole. Ten patients had concomitant Ps. aeruginosa infections. Patients were treated orally with 500 mg or 750 mg ciprofloxacin every 12 h. The overall clinical response rate was 88%, and the bacteriological response 76%, and 65% if Ps. aeruginosa is included. Resistance to ciprofloxacin developed in one Staph. aureus and one Ser. marcescens (MIC greater than 2 mg/l). Toxicity was minor. Ciprofloxacin was effective and safe therapy of infections due to Gram-negative bacteria resistant to many of the currently available oral and parenteral agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3804906     DOI: 10.1093/jac/18.supplement_d.179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  7 in total

Review 1.  Quinolone antimicrobial agents: adverse effects and bacterial resistance.

Authors:  J S Wolfson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Comparison of Etest and agar dilution method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Flavobacterium isolates.

Authors:  P R Hsueh; J C Chang; L J Teng; P C Yang; S W Ho; W C Hsieh; K T Luh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of flavobacteria as determined by agar dilution and disk diffusion methods.

Authors:  J C Chang; P R Hsueh; J J Wu; S W Ho; W C Hsieh; K T Luh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Development of resistance during antibiotic therapy.

Authors:  D Milatovic; I Braveny
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in multiresistant gram-negative intensive care unit isolates.

Authors:  C M Khurana; B R Wojack
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 6.  Worldwide clinical data on efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  P Schacht; G Arcieri; J Branolte; H Bruck; V Chyský; E Griffith; G Gruenwaldt; R Hullmann; C A Konopka; B O'Brien
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 7.  Ciprofloxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  D M Campoli-Richards; J P Monk; A Price; P Benfield; P A Todd; A Ward
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 9.546

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.