Literature DB >> 3801846

Pathology of the optic nerve and visual association areas. Information given by the flash and pattern visual evoked potential, and the temporal and spatial contrast sensitivity function.

C E Wright, N Drasdo, G F Harding.   

Abstract

Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity functions (CSF) were compared with visual evoked potentials (VEP) in two groups of patients with pathology selectively affecting different parts of the visual pathway. These consisted of 10 patients with a selective delay of the pattern VEP due to demyelination of one optic nerve (unilateral optic neuritis) and 11 patients with a selective delay of the flash VEP due to pathology of the visual association areas (primary presenile dementia, or Alzheimer's disease). The results led to the following conclusions. Comparison of the VEP and CSF results indicated that VEP latency was more closely associated with the temporal CSF than the spatial CSF. Pathology of the visual association areas which selectively increased the latency of the flash P2 component also reduced sensitivity at low and medium temporal frequencies. In demyelination of the optic nerve, a highly significant correlation was found between the delay of the pattern reversal VEP and sensitivity at high temporal frequencies. Comparison of the results in these two types of pathology suggests that the pattern VEP and flash P1 component, the spatial CSF, and temporal CSF at high temporal frequencies are all processed in the geniculostriate pathway. The flash P2 component and temporal CSF at low and medium frequencies were affected differently from the other measures. The possibility that these processes are transmitted by nongeniculate pathways is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3801846     DOI: 10.1093/brain/110.1.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  7 in total

1.  Genetic influence on contrast sensitivity in middle-aged male twins.

Authors:  Alice Cronin-Golomb; Matthew S Panizzon; Michael J Lyons; Carol E Franz; Michael D Grant; Kristen C Jacobson; Seth A Eisen; Thomas M Laudate; William S Kremen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Topographic mapping and source localization of the pattern reversal visual evoked magnetic response.

Authors:  G F Harding; B Janday; R A Armstrong
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Myelinated axon number in the optic nerve is unaffected by Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  D C Davies; P McCoubrie; B McDonald; K A Jobst
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Ophthalmologic Psychophysical Tests Support OCT Findings in Mild Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Elena Salobrar-Garcia; Rosa de Hoz; Blanca Rojas; Ana I Ramirez; Juan J Salazar; Raquel Yubero; Pedro Gil; Alberto Triviño; José M Ramirez
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Changes in visual function and retinal structure in the progression of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Elena Salobrar-García; Rosa de Hoz; Ana I Ramírez; Inés López-Cuenca; Pilar Rojas; Ravi Vazirani; Carla Amarante; Raquel Yubero; Pedro Gil; María D Pinazo-Durán; Juan J Salazar; José M Ramírez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Resting state in Alzheimer's disease: a concurrent analysis of Flash-Visual Evoked Potentials and quantitative EEG.

Authors:  Antonio Tartaglione; Luciano Spadavecchia; Marco Maculotti; Fabio Bandini
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.474

7.  Comparison of visual evoked potentials and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Robert Kromer; Nermin Serbecic; Lucrezia Hausner; Lutz Froelich; Sven C Beutelspacher
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.