Literature DB >> 3801366

Visual evoked potential latency and contrast sensitivity in patients with posterior chamber intraocular lens implants.

J W Howe, K W Mitchell, M Mahabaleswara, M N Abdel-Khalek.   

Abstract

An electrophysiological investigation of visual evoked potential (VEP) latency and contrast sensitivity was performed in a group of 13 patients who had undergone extracapsular cataract surgery with posterior chamber lens implantation. In spite of good postoperative visual acuity, abnormalities were detected in nine of the group (69%). This study suggests that, even with successfully implanted lenses, there may be a reduction in visual function which could be the result of altered transmission through the plastic lenticulus or fibrosis of the posterior lens capsule, and/or subtle changes in retinal architecture, not observed ophthalmoscopically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3801366      PMCID: PMC1040857          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.70.12.890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  11 in total

Review 1.  The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual disturbance.

Authors:  G B Arden
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  A survey of intraocular lens implantation in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  D Wong; A D Steele
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1985

3.  Contrast attenuation characteristics of iris clipped intraocular lens implants in situ.

Authors:  R F Hess; G C Woo; P D White
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  The objective assessment of contrast sensitivity function by electrophysiological means.

Authors:  J W Howe; K W Mitchell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Hessburg anterior chamber intraocular lens results.

Authors:  P C Hessburg; E R O'Malley
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1985-04

6.  The results of extracapsular cataract extraction with a Shearing posterior chamber lens implant 34 to 40 months after surgery.

Authors:  N S Jaffe; H M Clayman; M S Jaffe; D S Light
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1982-01

7.  Obtaining a high-quality retinal image with a biconvex intraocular lens.

Authors:  G J Wang; O Pomerantzeff
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Posterior capsule opacification: a specular microscopic study.

Authors:  P J McDonnell; W J Stark; W R Green
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Trends in cataract surgery and intraocular lenses in the United States.

Authors:  W J Stark; M C Leske; D M Worthen; G C Murray
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  [Experiences with the 1st 1400 posterior chamber lens implantations after phacoemulsification].

Authors:  C Ohrloff; M U Dardenne; C Konen; A Sherif
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 0.700

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of contrast sensitivity between posterior chamber lenses of silicone and PMMA material.

Authors:  C Skorpik; I Gottlob; H Weghaupt
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Functional vision with hydrogel versus PMMA lens implants.

Authors:  H Weghaupt; R Menapace; A Wedrich
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.117

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.