Literature DB >> 3800372

Safety indices associated with the use of contingent restraint procedures.

S Spreat, D Lipinski, J Hill, M E Halpin.   

Abstract

The safety of four general classes of contingent restraint was evaluated in a sample of 231 institutionalized mentally retarded persons. The use of mechanical restraints resulted in a significantly lower injury rate than did personal restraint. The use of restraint in emergency situations was found to be more dangerous than the planned use of such procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3800372     DOI: 10.1016/s0270-3092(86)80020-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Res Ment Retard        ISSN: 0270-3092


  2 in total

1.  The association for behavior analysis international position statement on restraint and seclusion.

Authors:  Timothy R Vollmer; Louis P Hagopian; Jon S Bailey; Michael F Dorsey; Gregory P Hanley; David Lennox; Mary M Riordan; Scott Spreat
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2011

2.  Social Validity Assessment of Physical Restraint Intervention by Care Providers of Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

Authors:  James K Luiselli; James M Sperry; Christine Draper
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2015-08-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.