Literature DB >> 3799713

Psychological response to amniocentesis: II. Effects of coping style.

S Phipps, A B Zinn.   

Abstract

Differences in coping style were assessed in a group of women undergoing amniocentesis and a control group not having the procedure. Subjects were divided into two groups according to coping style; "monitors" (information seekers) and "blunters" (information avoiders). In the amniocentesis group, coping style was associated with differences in mood state and change in mood state over time. "Monitors" experienced greater mood disturbance than "blunters" both before and during the procedure, but this effect disappeared after communication of amniocentesis results. Coping style was not associated with differences in maternal attitudes toward pregnancy or maternal-fetal attachment. In the control group, there were no differences between "monitors" and "blunters" on any of the mood state or pregnancy measures. Implications of these findings for providers of genetics services are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3799713     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320250116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Psychological coping with acute pain: an examination of the role of endogenous opioid mechanisms.

Authors:  S Bruehl; C R Carlson; J F Wilson; J A Norton; G Colclough; M J Brady; J J Sherman; J A McCubbin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1996-04

3.  Coping styles, paradox, and the cold pressor task.

Authors:  J S Efran; R L Chorney; L M Ascher; M D Lukens
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1989-02

4.  Coping styles, opioid blockade, and cardiovascular response to stress.

Authors:  S Bruehl; J A McCubbin; J F Wilson; T Montgomery; P Ibarra; C R Carlson
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-02

5.  A focus group study on breast cancer risk presentation: one format does not fit all.

Authors:  Michel Dorval; Karine Bouchard; Jocelyne Chiquette; Gord Glendon; Christine M Maugard; Wilhelm Dubuisson; Seema Panchal; Jacques Simard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Psychological outcomes following maternal serum screening: a cohort study.

Authors:  V Goel; R Glazier; A Summers; S Holzapfel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-09-22       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Effects of cognitive style and maintenance strategies on breast self-examination (BSE) practice by African American women.

Authors:  T C Jacob; N E Penn; J A Kulik; L E Spieth
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1992-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.