Literature DB >> 3799499

Comparison of methods to measure physical activity in postmenopausal women.

J A Cauley, R E LaPorte, R B Sandler, M M Schramm, A M Kriska.   

Abstract

Five methods for assessing physical activity were evaluated in a population of 255 white, postmenopausal women participating in a randomized trial on the effects of walking on bone loss. Methods were the Paffenbarger survey, a modified Paffenbarger, the large-scale integrated activity monitor (LSI), caloric intake, and the Baecke survey. Significant increase in physical activity was observed in the intervention group. Activity measures were weakly related to each other. Results of factor analyses suggest that factor I reflected voluntary leisure-time pursuits (such as walking) and factor II, activities of daily living. Participation in sports was not a significant contributor to overall activity of the women. Research on physical activity must define the particular dimension of activity measured. Several types of instruments should be used because different instruments reflect different activity patterns which, in turn, may be differentially related to disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3799499     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/45.1.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  11 in total

Review 1.  Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  The assessment of physical activity by leisure-time physical activity questionnaires.

Authors:  K L Lamb; D A Brodie
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Validation in London of a physical activity questionnaire for use in a study of postmenopausal osteopaenia.

Authors:  S Suleiman; M Nelson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Determinants of isometric muscle strength in men of different ages.

Authors:  P Era; A L Lyyra; J T Viitasalo; E Heikkinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

5.  Effect of walking distance on 8-year incident depressive symptoms in elderly men with and without chronic disease: the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study.

Authors:  Toby L Smith; Kamal H Masaki; Kaon Fong; Robert D Abbott; George W Ross; Helen Petrovitch; Patricia L Blanchette; Lon R White
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  The effects of walking on the cross-sectional dimensions of the radius in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  R B Sandler; J A Cauley; D L Hom; D Sashin; A M Kriska
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Test-retest reliability of the Women's Health Initiative physical activity questionnaire.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Meyer; Kelly R Evenson; Libby Morimoto; David Siscovick; Emily White
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Psychometric properties of the KPAS in diverse ethnic groups of midlife women.

Authors:  Bokim Lee; Eun-Ok Im; Wonshik Chee
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.967

9.  Reported frequency of physical activity in a large epidemiological study: relationship to specific activities and repeatability over time.

Authors:  Miranda E G Armstrong; Benjamin J Cairns; Jane Green; Gillian K Reeves; Valerie Beral
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Television, physical activity, diet, and body weight status: the ARIC cohort.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Meyer; Kelly R Evenson; David J Couper; June Stevens; Mark A Pereria; Gerardo Heiss
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.