Literature DB >> 3794336

Twenty-five minutes between blood pressure readings: the influence on prevalence rates of isolated systolic hypertension.

J M van Loo, P G Peer, T A Thien.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of a 25-min time interval between the first and the last reading of a series of six, on systolic (SBP) and Phase V diastolic (DBP) blood pressure and its implications for prevalence rates of hypertension. Readings were taken from 5999 persons (2889 men and 3110 women) by two observers using a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer. The first reading was taken 5 min after entering the examining room. The study showed a considerable fall in mean SBP (men, 10.3 mmHg; women, 10.4 mmHg) and hardly a difference in mean DBP (men, 0.8 mmHg; women, 0.1 mmHg) between the first and sixth reading. The fall in SBP was independent of observer and sex and hardly correlated with age or Quetelet's index. The study also showed the implications for the classification of hypertension. Prevalence rates of isolated systolic hypertension dropped remarkably (men, 4.0 to 0.5%; women, 0.9 to 0.1%) between both readings while prevalence rates of severe, moderate and mild diastolic hypertension were nearly similar for the first and sixth reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3794336     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-198610000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  8 in total

1.  Waiting a few extra minutes before measuring blood pressure has potentially important clinical and research ramifications.

Authors:  S B Nikolic; W P Abhayaratna; R Leano; M Stowasser; J E Sharman
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Measurement error in the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer: what damage has been done and what can we learn?

Authors:  R M Conroy; E O'Brien; K O'Malley; N Atkins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-15

3.  Differences of blood pressure estimates between consecutive measurements on one occasion: implications for inter-study comparability of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  M B Schulze; A Kroke; M M Bergmann; H Boeing
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 4.  Epidemiology of stroke. Importance of preventive pharmacological strategies in elderly patients and associated costs.

Authors:  I Kawachi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Confounders of auscultatory blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  R H Baker; J Ende
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Helen E Ward; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Nonadherence to Recommended Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  Jack Levy; Linda M Gerber; Xian Wu; Samuel J Mann
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 8.  A systematic review of the effect of pre-test rest duration on toe and ankle systolic blood pressure measurements.

Authors:  Sean Sadler; Vivienne Chuter; Fiona Hawke
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-04-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.