Literature DB >> 3791387

Radioiodinated surface proteins of rabbit trophectoderm cells.

A P Ricketts, D W Scott, D W Bullock.   

Abstract

We have previously used surface iodination to discriminate between the protein patterns of epithelial cell surfaces in uteri of rabbits receptive (Day 6.5) or nonreceptive (Day 4) to nidation (Ricketts et al. 1984). In this paper, we describe application of the same technique to the trophoblastic surface of rabbit blastocysts collected on the same days of pregnancy. Analysis of labelled proteins by polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis under denaturing conditions did not reveal qualitative differences between the two days of pregnancy. Scanning densitometry was used to quantitate the area under each protein peak on an autoradiogram; these areas were used as variables in statistical analysis of the protein pattern of individual animals. Quantitative differences between the protein patterns of the two surfaces were detected by canonical variate analysis of the pattern of relative areas of labelled protein peaks. In proteins separated on 7.5% gels, this statistical analysis correctly assigned blastocysts from 8 out of 10 animals to one of two groups according to day of pregnancy. The discrimination was not statistically significant, however, in protein patterns on 12.5% gels, used to give better separation in the lower range of molecular weights. The same analysis in the uterus unequivocally separated the surface iodination patterns from these same days of pregnancy. Thus the changes detected by surface iodination appear to be less pronounced on the trophectoderm than on the uterine epithelium in relation to the time of ovoimplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3791387     DOI: 10.1007/bf00215209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Tissue Res        ISSN: 0302-766X            Impact factor:   5.249


  23 in total

Review 1.  Cellular basis of interaction between trophoblast and uterus at implantation.

Authors:  S Schlafke; A C Enders
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Blastocyst surface charge and implantation in the mouse.

Authors:  O Nilsson; I Lindqvist; G Ronquist
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  In vitro studies on the control of trophoblast outgrowth in the mouse.

Authors:  E J Jenkinson; I B Wilson
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1973-08

4.  Cell surface changes on the mouse blastocyst at implantation.

Authors:  E J Jenkinson; R F Searle
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Electrophoretic quantification of the changes in the average net negative surface charge density of mouse blastocysts implanting in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  B O Nilsson; S Hjertén
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Electrophoretic analysis of cell surface proteins of preimplantation mouse embryos.

Authors:  L V Johnson; P G Calarco
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1980-06-01       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  Receptors to Dolichos biflorus agglutinin. A new cell surface marker common to teratocarcinoma cells and preimplantation mouse embryos.

Authors:  H Fujimoto; T Muramatsu; H Urushihara; K O Yanagisawa
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.880

8.  Carbohydrate changes in pre- and peri-implantation mouse embryos as detected by a monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  P Marticorena; B Hogan; A DiMeo; K Artzt; D Bennett
Journal:  Cell Differ       Date:  1983-01

9.  Polar differences of delayed and implanting mouse blastocysts in binding of Alcian Blue and concanavalin A.

Authors:  B O Nilsson; G Naeslund; B Curman
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1980-11

10.  Concanavalin A binding capacity of preimplantation mouse embryos.

Authors:  J T Wu
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1980-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.