Literature DB >> 3791343

Bilateral simultaneous indirect systolic blood pressure measurements.

D R Goldhill.   

Abstract

An apparatus was used for measuring bilateral simultaneous indirect blood pressure in two groups of subjects. Interconnected cuffs were positioned around the arms and Doppler probes placed over each brachial artery to identify systolic pressure. In the first group of 52 subjects an observer listened simultaneously to both Doppler outputs. Cuff deflation followed American Heart Association recommendations (2-3 mm Hg X s-1). In the second group of 68 subjects Doppler output and cuff pressure were recorded and cuff deflation was slower. In the first group, 37% of subjects had a difference in pressure in the arms of greater than or equal to 6 mm Hg and 13% of greater than or equal to 11 mm Hg. In the second group there was no statistically significant difference between the pressures, with only 6% differing by greater than or equal to 6 mm Hg, the greatest difference being 9 mm Hg. It is concluded that study methods may have contributed to the large differences reported previously.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3791343     DOI: 10.1093/cvr/20.10.774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Res        ISSN: 0008-6363            Impact factor:   10.787


  5 in total

1.  A comparison of measurements of blood pressure, heart-rate and oxygenation during inter-hospital transport of the critically ill.

Authors:  C J Runcie; W Reeve; J Reidy; J R Dougall
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Prevalence of inter-arm blood pressure difference among clinical out-patients.

Authors:  Balkishan Sharma; Pramila Ramawat
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2016-04

3.  Automatic noninvasive measurement of systolic blood pressure using photoplethysmography.

Authors:  Meir Nitzan; Amikam Patron; Zehava Glik; Abraham T Weiss
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  The effect of hemiplegia on blood pressure measurement in the elderly.

Authors:  R Dewar; D Sykes; E Mulkerrin; F Nicklason; D Thomas; R Seymour
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Confounders of auscultatory blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  R H Baker; J Ende
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.128

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.