Literature DB >> 3790429

Morphology of intestinal allograft rejection and the inadequacy of mucosal biopsy in its recognition.

P R Millard, A Dennison, D A Hughes, J Collin, P J Morris.   

Abstract

Small intestinal segmental autografts and allografts in dogs were examined histologically to assess changes associated with the surgical technique, the effect of different luminal perfusates and for evidence of rejection. Some animals were immunosuppressed with Cyclosporin A. Specimens for examination were obtained by biopsy at regular intervals after transplantation, at death or when killed. Typical vascular changes of rejection were identified only within some allografts and in others the cause of graft failure remains conjectural. When there was rejection characteristic lesions were confined to the submucosa and muscle coats while changes in the mucosa were similar to those in the autografts. These mucosal features were affected by the nature of the perfusate and often appeared transiently after grafting. Mucosal biopsy as a way of monitoring intestinal allograft rejection neither reveals a sequential pattern of changes, nor provides a reliable method of recognition of the reaction. In contrast full thickness biopsies of the intestinal wall do appear to fulfil both of these requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3790429      PMCID: PMC2012960     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Exp Pathol        ISSN: 0007-1021


  11 in total

1.  FUNCTION AND SURVIVAL OF JEJUNAL HOMOTRANSPLANTS IN DOGS WITH AND WITHOUT IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE TREATMENT.

Authors:  F W PRESTON; F MACALALAD; R GRABER; E J JACKSON; J SPORN
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  The university surgeon and his society: reflections and perspectives.

Authors:  J D HARDY
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Fatty acid absorption in jejunal autograft and allograft.

Authors:  W P Stamford; M A Hardy
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Problems in absorption and immunosuppression after entire intestinal allotransplantation.

Authors:  J O Ruiz; H Uchida; L S Schultz; R C Lillehei
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  The isolated allograft pouch: a useful method for monitoring small bowel allografts.

Authors:  A Kunlin; J P Gaston; M H Shiu; S J Winawer; J G Fortner
Journal:  Surg Forum       Date:  1971

6.  Absorptive function in canine jejunal autografts and allografts.

Authors:  W B Cohen; M A Hardy; J Quint; D State
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Small bowel transplantation.

Authors:  R L Kirkman
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Histologic monitoring of rejection in small intestinal transplantation.

Authors:  A Lossing; S Nordgren; Z Cohen; J Cullen; G Craddock; B Langer
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Morphologic studies of intestinal allograft rejection. Immunosuppression with cyclosporine.

Authors:  Z Cohen; S Nordgren; A Lossing; J Cullen; G Craddock; B Langer
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Small bowel transplantation in the dog using cyclosporine.

Authors:  G N Craddock; S R Nordgren; R K Reznick; T Gilas; A G Lossing; Z Cohen; C R Stiller; J B Cullen; B Langer
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  7 in total

1.  Multivisceral intestinal transplantation: surgical pathology.

Authors:  R Jaffe; J D Trager; A Zeevi; E Sonmez-Alpan; R Duquesnoy; S Todo; M Rowe; T E Starzl
Journal:  Pediatr Pathol       Date:  1989

2.  Rejection of multivisceral allografts in rats: a sequential analysis with comparison to isolated orthotopic small-bowel and liver grafts.

Authors:  N Murase; A J Demetris; D G Kim; S Todo; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Canine total orthotopic small bowel transplantation under FK 506.

Authors:  F Yoshimi; K Nakamura; Y Zhu; M Suzuki; Y Funakoshi; G Carrieri; Y Wu; H Furukawa; A J Demetris; S Todo
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 4.  Current status of intestinal transplantation.

Authors:  A J Watson; P A Lear
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  In situ proliferating status of mononuclear cells in rat small bowel grafts.

Authors:  M Okamoto; K Arakawa; S Fushiki
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Value of in vivo electrophysiological measurements to evaluate canine small bowel autotransplants.

Authors:  M A Meijssen; E Heineman; R W de Bruin; H J Veeze; J Bijman; H R de Jonge; F J ten Kate; R L Marquet; J C Molenaar
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Effect of rejection on electrophysiologic function of canine intestinal grafts: correlation with histopathology and Na-K-ATPase activity.

Authors:  I Takeyoshi; S Zhang; Y Kokudo; K Nakamura; A Ikoma; Y Zhu; T E Starzl; S Todo
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.533

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.