Literature DB >> 3790382

Optimum pacing mode for patients with angina pectoris.

R A Kenny, A Ingram, T Mitsuoka, K Walsh, R Sutton.   

Abstract

A within patient double blind prospective study of symptoms and exercise tolerance was designed to determine the preferred pacing mode in 10 patients with programmable dual chamber pacemakers who also had angina pectoris. Patients were randomly allocated to one month in each of the following modes: ventricular pacing at 70 beats/min (VVI) or atrioventricular synchronous upper rate 150 beats/min (DDD 150) or 100 beats/min (DDD 100). Medications were unchanged throughout the study; none was taking beta blockers. At the end of each month patients underwent an exercise test. During each month patients recorded symptoms and their preferred pacing mode. DDD 100 was the preferred mode (seven patients). There was significantly less chest pain with this mode than with either of the other modes. There were significantly more episodes of dizziness in VVI, and two patients who developed pacemaker syndrome were unable to complete the pacing period. Three patients developed angina during exercise testing in DDD 150. Atrial synchronous ventricular pacing is better than ventricular pacing for the control of symptoms in patients with angina pectoris provided that the upper atrial tracking rate is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3790382      PMCID: PMC1236894          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.56.5.463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  6 in total

1.  The diagnosis of ischaemic heart pain and intermittent claudication in field surveys.

Authors:  G A ROSE
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1962       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  Physiological cardiac pacing.

Authors:  R Sutton; J Perrins; P Citron
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Hemodynamic effects of atrial synchronization in acute and long-term ventricular pacing.

Authors:  L Kappenberger; H O Gloor; I Babotai; W Steinbrunn; M Turina
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  A comparison of the acute and long-term hemodynamic effects of ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing.

Authors:  I Kruse; K Arnman; T B Conradson; L Rydén
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Atrial synchronous ventricular pacing in ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  B E Kristensson; K Arnman; L Rydén
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Sustained improvement in exercise tolerance following physiological cardiac pacing.

Authors:  R Sutton; E J Perrins; C Morley; S L Chan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 29.983

  6 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Is VVI pacing outmoded?

Authors:  A W Nathan; D W Davies
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-04

2.  Benefits of dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.

Authors:  T Mitsuoka; R A Kenny; T A Yeung; S L Chan; J E Perrins; R Sutton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-10

3.  Short-term effects of right atrial, right ventricular apical, and atrioventricular sequential pacing on myocardial oxygen consumption and cardiac efficiency in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Z S Kyriakides; A Antoniadis; E Iliodromitis; N Michelakakis; D T Kremastinos
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-06

Review 4.  Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.

Authors:  J Dretzke; W D Toff; G Y H Lip; J Raftery; A Fry-Smith; R Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.