Literature DB >> 3789903

Patient satisfaction in Scott and Small-Carrion penile implant recipients: a study of 52 patients.

J F Steege, A L Stout, C C Carson.   

Abstract

Physical penile sensations and levels of sexual satisfaction and activity were assessed in a questionnaire survey of 52 penile implant recipients. Although technical surgical success rates were high and 90% of recipients would elect to have surgery again, overall sexual adjustment did not approach premorbid conditions. Reasons for incomplete satisfaction included altered sensations of erection, decreased penile dimensions when compared with recalled preoperative dimensions, and decreased sensations during ejaculation. Some of these changes may have been due to decreased arousal during intercourse. Potential implant recipients should be counseled regarding realistic expectations of the benefits of penile prosthesis implant surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3789903     DOI: 10.1007/bf01543110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  11 in total

1.  A history of surgical treatment of impotence.

Authors:  W F Gee
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  The impotent patient: surgical treatment with penile prosthesis and psychiatric evaluation.

Authors:  W F Gee; J W McRoberts; J O Raney; J S Ansell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Adjustment following surgical implantation of a penile prosthesis: a critical overview.

Authors:  G F Collins; B N Kinder
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  1984

4.  Female partner perception of Small-Carrion implant.

Authors:  S Kramarsky-Binkhorst
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Penile prosthesis: psychologic factors.

Authors:  T D Stewart; S N Gerson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  The penile prosthesis: a review.

Authors:  W M Sotile
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  1979

7.  Experience with penile prostheses in the treatment of impotence in diabetic men.

Authors:  R S Beaser; C Van der Hoek; A M Jacobson; T M Flood; R E Desautels
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-08-27       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Success with penile prosthesis from patient's viewpoint.

Authors:  J B Hollander; A C Diokno
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Erectile impotence treated with an implantable, inflatable prosthesis. Five years of clinical experience.

Authors:  F B Scott; G J Byrd; I Karacan; P Olsson; L E Beutler; S L Attia
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-06-15       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Inflatable penile prosthesis: follow-up study of patient-partner satisfaction.

Authors:  D L Gerstenberger; D Osborne; W L Furlow
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  3 in total

1.  The unnecessary penile implant.

Authors:  J Shaw
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1989-10

Review 2.  Prevalence of post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and a review of the recommended therapeutic modalities.

Authors:  Thiago Fernandes Negris Lima; Joshua Bitran; Fabio Stefano Frech; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 3.  Inflatable penile prosthesis in the radical prostatectomy patient: a review.

Authors:  Nelson Bennett; I-Shen Huang
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-06-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.