Literature DB >> 3789237

Evaluation of public health preschool child developmental screening: the process and outcomes of a community program.

D Cadman, L W Chambers, S D Walter, R Ferguson, N Johnston, J McNamee.   

Abstract

We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a public health and education screening program aimed at all 4,797 four to five year old children registering for kindergarten in three school districts of southern Ontario, Canada. Children received either the Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST) with a community health intervention program for positive screeness; the DDST with no intervention for positive screenees; or no screening test. The intervention program consisted of referral to the child's physician for assessment; a review conference between the child's teacher and the school health nurse; parent counseling; and monitoring of the child in school by the school health nurse. At the end of the third school year, no differences were found between positive screenees in the community health intervention group and the "no intervention" groups using individual academic achievement, cognitive, and developmental tests. Parents' reports revealed no differences between groups in children's mental, social, and behavioral well-being. However, parents of intervention program children had more worry about their child's school progress suggesting a potentially harmful labeling effect. In comparison to a random sample of children with normal DDST results, or a random sample of children who had randomly not been screened, the children with positive preschool DDSTs had substantially more school problems three years after screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3789237      PMCID: PMC1646797          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.77.1.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  20 in total

1.  Characteristics of blacks obtaining Papanicolaou smears.

Authors:  R B Warnecke; S Graham
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Child health clincs and inverse care laws: evidence from longitudinal study of 1878 pre-school children.

Authors:  P M Zinkin; C A Cox
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-08-14

3.  Implementing the developmental assessment component of the EPSDT program.

Authors:  Beatrice D Moore
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  1978-01

4.  Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Controversy in counting and attributing events in clinical trials.

Authors:  D L Sackett; M Gent
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Toward a clarification of primary prevention.

Authors:  D W DeWild
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1980

7.  A preschool screening program on central Vancouver Island: a two-year follow-up.

Authors:  A Thores; J Philion
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1974 Sep-Oct

8.  Missed opportunities for early diagnosis of cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  R G Fruchter; J Boyce; M Hunt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Phenylketonuria: epitome of human biochemical genetics (second of two parts).

Authors:  C R Scriver; C L Clow
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-12-11       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  General health screening of four-year-olds in a Swedish county. IV. An analysis of the effectiveness of the psychological examination program.

Authors:  C Nilsson; C Sundelin; J C Vuille
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand       Date:  1976-11
View more
  15 in total

1.  How serious are the adverse effects of screening?

Authors:  W Feldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Preschool child health surveillance.

Authors:  S J Gillam; A F Colver
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-06

3.  Impact of diastolic and systolic blood pressure on mortality: implications for the definition of "normal".

Authors:  Brent C Taylor; Timothy J Wilt; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Nipissing District Developmental Screen: patterns of use by physicians in Ontario.

Authors:  Marjolaine M Limbos; David P Joyce; G Jane Roberts
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Periodic health examination, 1989 update: 3. Preschool examination for developmental, visual and hearing problems. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Recommendations on screening for developmental delay.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Effective and ineffective use of fear in health promotion campaigns.

Authors:  R F Soames Job
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Predicting problems in school performance from preschool health, developmental and behavioural assessments.

Authors:  D Cadman; S D Walter; L W Chambers; R Ferguson; P Szatmari; N Johnson; J McNamee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  On evaluation of early screening programs.

Authors:  R B Darling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits.

Authors:  M B Barton; S Moore; S Polk; E Shtatland; J G Elmore; S W Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.