Literature DB >> 3788956

Designation of children with high blood pressure--considerations on percentile cut points and subsequent high blood pressure: the Bogalusa Heart Study.

C L Shear, G L Burke, D S Freedman, L S Webber, G S Berenson.   

Abstract

The effects of changing the percentile cut points of prior blood pressure measurements (both single and serial examinations) on prediction of subsequent high blood pressure, and of the definition of subsequent high blood pressure were assessed in 1,501 children from Bogalusa, Louisiana. Subjects were 2-14 years old at initial examination (year 1, 1973-1974) and were reexamined three, five, and eight years after the initial examination. Increasing the stringency of the prior measurement cut point resulted in increased specificity and positive predictive value, but decreased sensitivity and negative predictive value. For prediction of subsequent systolic blood pressure at the 90th percentile from year 1 levels, increasing the year 1 cut point from the 80th to the 95th percentile resulted in decreased sensitivity from 42.8 to 13.0%, and increased specificity from 83.0 to 97.3%. For systolic pressure, requiring all prior serial measurements to be above specified cut points resulted in further increases in specificity (maximizing at 100%) and decreases in sensitivity (minimizing at 2.1%). Using a year 1 cut point at the 90th percentile, increases in the definition of subsequent high blood pressure (from the 80th percentile to 140/90 mmHg or on treatment, respectively) resulted in increased sensitivity (from 20.5 to 33.3%) and negative predictive value, with decreasing specificity (from 93.9 to 91.3%) and positive predictive value. The results indicate that use of stringent criteria (serially at the 95th percentile) to identify children at risk for future essential hypertension will result in a substantial portion of the childhood population who will escape early identification but who will develop adult hypertension. Less stringent criteria will increase sensitivity and thereby provide the opportunity for primary prevention to a larger portion of the general childhood population who are at high risk for adult hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3788956     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  3 in total

1.  Essential hypertension vs. secondary hypertension among children.

Authors:  Monesha Gupta-Malhotra; Ashish Banker; Sanjay Shete; Syed Sharukh Hashmi; John E Tyson; Michelle S Barratt; Jacqueline T Hecht; Diane M Milewicz; Eric Boerwinkle
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 2.  Screening children for hypertension: the case against.

Authors:  Nicole Ide; Matthew Thompson
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Body fatness and risk for elevated blood pressure, total cholesterol, and serum lipoprotein ratios in children and adolescents.

Authors:  D P Williams; S B Going; T G Lohman; D W Harsha; S R Srinivasan; L S Webber; G S Berenson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.308

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.