Literature DB >> 3788675

The use of brainstem auditory evoked potentials during posterior fossa surgery as a monitor of brainstem function.

R Kálmánchey, A Avila, L Symon.   

Abstract

Nine patients with unilateral ponto-cerebellar tumour, one with epidermoid, eight with acoustic neuroma had intraoperative monitoring of the brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) using bilateral scalp recording (Cz-A1 and Cz-A2) and binaural stimulation in order to monitor brainstem function during the surgery. Results were correlated with preoperative and postoperative BAEP findings. There was some intraoperative BAEP change in all the patients. Halothane anaesthesia caused bilateral wave V. prolongation in six patients. Lumbar drainage produced ipsilateral or bilateral wave V. prolongation in three of four patients in whom lumbar drainage was established. Opening the dura produced ipsilateral or bilateral wave V. depression or bilateral prolongation in four patients. Tumour dissection caused BAEP changes in all the patients: bilateral prolongation or depression in five patients, and ipsilateral prolongation and/or depression in six patients, three of them together with bilateral changes. The only patient who had no changes in wave I-IV. but in whom a big wave VI. appeared at the tumour side during removal, had epidermoid tumour. At the end of surgery there was some improvement in all patients, but in two the improvement was not striking: in one BAEP remained flat ipsilaterally, and in other, latency did not improve. All the patients had a good clinical recovery a few days later, but the control BAEP performed from the 3rd-7th postoperative day was not yet completely recovered in four patients. Intraoperative BAEP monitoring can be a useful technique to monitor brainstem function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3788675     DOI: 10.1007/bf01456373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  13 in total

1.  Reversible evoked potential changes with retraction of the eighth cranial nerve.

Authors:  B L Grundy; A Lina; P T Procopio; P J Jannetta
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Monitoring of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  C K Whittaker
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Preservation of cochlear nerve function with the aid of brain stem auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  R W Hardy; S E Kinney; H Lueders; R P Lesser
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Intraoperative monitoring of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  B L Grundy; P J Jannetta; P T Procopio; A Lina; J R Boston; E Doyle
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  The effects of acoustic neuromas on ipsilateral and contralateral brain stem auditory evoked responses during stimulation of the unaffected ear.

Authors:  R A Zappulla; E Greenblatt; B Z Karmel
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1982-10

6.  Neonatal development of auditory system potentials averaged from the scalp of rat and cat.

Authors:  D L Jewett; M N Romano
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1972-01-14       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Intraoperative monitoring of evoked potentials.

Authors:  P A Raudzens
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Auditory brain stem responses in patients with posterior fossa tumors.

Authors:  H Walser; M G Yaşargil; M Curcic
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1982-12

9.  Intraoperative monitoring of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  P A Raudzens; A G Shetter
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Use of intraoperative auditory evoked potentials to preserve hearing in unilateral acoustic neuroma removal.

Authors:  R G Ojemann; R A Levine; W M Montgomery; P McGaffigan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.115

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.