Literature DB >> 3784840

Gastric emptying. Risk versus benefit in the treatment of acute poisoning.

D H Wheeler-Usher, L A Wanke, M J Bayer.   

Abstract

This review examines the various clinical options used to elicit gastric emptying, viz. drug-induced emesis, mechanical pharyngeal stimulation, gastric lavage, and catharsis. Apomorphine and syrup of ipecac are the 2 drugs most frequently used for induction of emesis. Both agents act centrally and, in addition, syrup of ipecac has a peripheral action. Toxins ingested or foods previously eaten may inhibit or enhance emetic action by interfering with mediating and conducting mechanisms. Studies indicate that both syrup of ipecac and apomorphine are similarly effective in inducing emesis; however, apomorphine has a shorter reaction time compared with syrup of ipecac. There are more risks involved with the use of apomorphine, since it causes central nervous system and respiratory depression. Syrup of ipecac has been shown to be relatively safe when used in its recommended dosage for emesis. However, several toxicities have been reported with the use of the fluid extract of ipecac. Emesis is contraindicated in patients who are obtunded or comatose, and in patients who have ingested stimulants, some hydrocarbons, or corrosives. Mechanical pharyngeal stimulation is a simple method of inducing emesis; however, it is often unsuccessful and rarely recovers a significant portion of the gastric contents. Gastric lavage is a procedure which has been relied upon for over a century. Its effectiveness is dependent on the nature, form, and dosage of the poison, latency between time of ingestion and lavage, and technique. In clinical experiments studying gastric lavage, it has been noted that the procedure is most beneficial 1 to 2 hours postingestion for the majority of poison ingestions. Lavage also provides an excellent route for activated charcoal and selected antidotes. Gastric lavage may pose several risks to the patient, including obstruction and contamination of the airways and oesophageal damage. Contraindications for gastric lavage are similar to those for emesis except that it may be safer to use in obtunded, comatose, or uncooperative patients. Cathartics used during initial poisoning therapy are usually the saline cathartics. They elicit an osmotic reaction in the small intestine which results in increased intraluminal fluid bulk, hyperperistalsis, and subsequent propulsion of contents. Cathartics have also been shown to stimulate the secretion of cholecystokinin, which is thought to have similar effects on the intestine. Cathartics have not been shown to significantly enhance drug elimination from the gastrointestinal tract.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3784840     DOI: 10.1007/bf03259833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Toxicol        ISSN: 0112-5966


  61 in total

Review 1.  Mode of action of the saline purgatives.

Authors:  R F Harvey; A E Read
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Effect of ablation of medullary emetic chemoreceptor trigger zone on vomiting responses to cerebral intraventricular injection of adrenaline, apomorphine and pilocarpine in the cat.

Authors:  H L BORISON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1959-06-23       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Evaluation of the efficacy of lavage and induced emesis in treatment of salicylate poisoning.

Authors:  F J ARNOLD; J B HODGES; R A BARTA
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1959-02       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Copper sulphate emesis; a study of afferent pathways from the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  S C WANG; H L BORISON
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1951-02

Review 5.  Emergency treatment of common poisons: emptying the stomach.

Authors:  R Goulding; G N Volans
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1977-11

6.  Aspiration pneumonia; incidence of aspiration with endotracheal tubes.

Authors:  S B Spray; G D Zuidema; J L Cameron
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Ipecac syrup in antiemetic ingestion.

Authors:  M E Thoman; H L Verhulst
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1966-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Actions of cholecystokinin and secretin on the motor activity of the small intestine in man.

Authors:  J G Gutiérrez; W Y Chey; V P Dinoso
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 9.  Advances in clinical toxicology.

Authors:  M T Boehnert; W J Lewander; P Gaudreault; F H Lovejoy
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.278

10.  Effects of oral magnesium sulphate on colonic motility in patients with the irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  R F Harvey; A E Read
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  6 in total

1.  A review of the management of oral drug overdose in the Accident and Emergency Department of the Royal Brisbane Hospital.

Authors:  D W Hodgkinson; L B Jellett; R H Ashby
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1991-03

Review 2.  Physical assessment and differential diagnosis of the poisoned patient.

Authors:  K R Olson; P R Pentel; M T Kelley
Journal:  Med Toxicol       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb

Review 3.  Role of extracorporeal drug removal in acute theophylline poisoning. A review.

Authors:  A Heath; K Knudsen
Journal:  Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug

Review 4.  Oral activated charcoal in the treatment of intoxications. Role of single and repeated doses.

Authors:  P J Neuvonen; K T Olkkola
Journal:  Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp       Date:  1988 Jan-Dec

5.  The hazards of gastric lavage for intentional self-poisoning in a resource poor location.

Authors:  Michael Eddleston; Sapumal Haggalla; K Reginald; K Sudarshan; M Senthilkumaran; Lakshman Karalliedde; Ariaranee Ariaratnam; M H Rezvi Sheriff; David A Warrell; Nick A Buckley
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.467

6.  A learning-based method for online adjustment of C-arm Cone-beam CT source trajectories for artifact avoidance.

Authors:  Mareike Thies; Jan-Nico Zäch; Cong Gao; Russell Taylor; Nassir Navab; Andreas Maier; Mathias Unberath
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.924

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.