Literature DB >> 3783788

Selective management of blunt splenic trauma.

P Mucha, R C Daly, M B Farnell.   

Abstract

During a recent 8-year period, 235 patients with documented blunt splenic trauma were treated. After exclusion of 39 patients with early deaths (19 dead on arrival, nine died in emergency room, and 11 died in operating room), the 196 remaining patients were treated in accordance with an evolving selective management program. Definitive management included splenectomy in 117 patients (59.7%), repair in 32 (16.3%), and nonoperative treatment in 47 (24%). A spectrum of blunt splenic trauma, as manifested by the degree of associated injuries (Injury Severity Scores), hemodynamic status, and blood transfusion requirements, was identified and permitted application of a rational selective management program that proved safe and effective for all age groups. Comparative analysis of the three methods of treatment demonstrated differences that were more a reflection of the overall magnitude of total bodily injury sustained rather than the specific manner in which any injured spleen was managed. Retrospective analysis of 19 nonoperative management failures enabled establishment of the following selection criteria for nonoperative management: absolute hemodynamic stability; minimal or lack of peritoneal findings; and maximal transfusion requirement of 2 units for the splenic injury. With operative management, splenorrhaphy is preferred, but it was often precluded by associated life-threatening injuries or by technical limitations. Of 42 attempted splenic repairs, ten (24%) were abandoned intraoperatively. There were no late failures of repair. In many cases of blunt splenic trauma, splenectomy still remains the most appropriate course of action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3783788     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-198611000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  8 in total

1.  Non-operative management of a splenic laceration in a patient with the Proteus syndrome.

Authors:  W Ceelen; J De Waele; M Kunnen; B de Hemptinne
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1997-03

Review 2.  The role of nonoperative management of the injured spleen.

Authors:  E E Cornwell
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Management outcomes in splenic injury: a statewide trauma center review.

Authors:  T V Clancy; D G Ramshaw; J G Maxwell; D L Covington; M P Churchill; R Rutledge; D W Oller; P R Cunningham; J W Meredith; M H Thomason; C C Baker
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Updating the management of salvageable splenic injury.

Authors:  C L Witte; M J Esser; W D Rappaport
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Experience with selective operative and nonoperative treatment of splenic injuries in 193 patients.

Authors:  H L Pachter; F C Spencer; S R Hofstetter; H G Liang; J Hoballah; G F Coppa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Splenorrhaphy. The alternative.

Authors:  D V Feliciano; V Spjut-Patrinely; J M Burch; K L Mattox; C G Bitondo; P Cruse-Martocci; G L Jordan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  "How safe is splenectomy?".

Authors:  S T O'Sullivan; C M Reardon; J A O'Donnell; W O Kirwan; M P Brady
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Blunt splenic injury in Sikkimese children and adolescents.

Authors:  Pradip Kumar Mohanta; Amrita Ghosh; Ranabir Pal; Shrayan Pal
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2011-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.