Literature DB >> 3783718

Comparative morphology of the amphibian opercularis system: I. General design features and functional interpretation.

T E Hetherington, A P Jaslow, R E Lombard.   

Abstract

The morphology of the opercularis system of anuran and caudate amphibians suggests that it acts to produce motion of the operculum that in turn produces fluid motion within the inner ear. The operculum and opercularis muscle form a lever system, with a narrow connection between the operculum and otic capsule acting as a fulcrum about which the operculum moves in response to forces applied via the muscle. The opercula of many species possess a muscular process on which the muscle inserts, thereby increasing the moment arm through which the muscle acts. The tonicity of the opercularis muscle allows tensile forces produced by substrate vibration or other mechanical energy applied to the forelimb to be effectively transmitted to the operculum; the elasticity of the connective tissue holding the operculum in place should act to return the operculum to its original position. The opercularis systems of frogs and non-plethodontid salamanders are similar structurally and functionally; that of plethodontid salamanders is structurally distinct but also functions as a lever system. Fluid motion produced by opercular motion could stimulate various end organs of the inner ear; the saccule, lagena, and amphibian papilla are in close approximation and wave energy could directly affect their otoconial or tectorial structures. In those anurans with a tympanic ear, the stapedial footplate and operculum articulate, but this articulation allows both to move independently. The stapes-tympanum complex and opercularis system therefore appear to be independent functional systems, and it is unlikely that the opercularis system modulates middle ear responsiveness. The general design of the opercularis system is consistent with a function in reception of substrate vibrations.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3783718     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051900105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  6 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the frog ear.

Authors:  Pim Van Dijk; Matthew J Mason; Richard L M Schoffelen; Peter M Narins; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Comparative and developmental patterns of amphibious auditory function in salamanders.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Zeyl; Carol E Johnston
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF THE MIDDLE EAR APPARATUS OF THE AQUATIC FROG, XENOPUS LAEVIS.

Authors:  Mj Mason; M Wang; Pm Narins
Journal:  Proc Inst Acoust       Date:  2009-01-01

Review 4.  Hearing without a tympanic ear.

Authors:  Grace Capshaw; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.308

5.  Biomechanics of vibration reception in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana.

Authors:  T E Hetherington
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  The vertebrate middle and inner ear: A short overview.

Authors:  Cathrin Pfaff; Julia A Schultz; Rico Schellhorn
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 1.804

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.