Literature DB >> 378354

Immunological skin testing and interpretation: a plea for uniformity.

S E Bates, J Y Suen, B L Tranum.   

Abstract

Immunological skin tests are one of the major methods used for the assessment of one's immune status. A review of the literature clearly reveals that there is no uniform methods for the administration and interpretation of skin tests. Without uniformity, it is obvious that data are not comparable. Contradictory conclusions may be reached from the same skin test data, depending upon the method of interpretation used. Precedent, rather than rationale, has often determined the method of interpretation. There are studies which suggest that slight induration or erythema, often considered negative, are significant immunologic events. The various methods of skin test administration and interpretation are reviewed. Recommendations for application and interpretation are presented so that uniformity may exist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 378354     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197906)43:6<2306::aid-cncr2820430621>3.0.co;2-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  11 in total

1.  Screening for delayed-hypersensitivity in Italian children: multicentric study by multitest skin testing.

Authors:  M Bardare; L Armenio; L Businco; G Cavagni; M De Martino; M Duse; M Masi; V Monafo; M C Pietrogrande; P Tovo
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Specific immune responses to skin test antigens following repeated multiple antigen skin tests in normal individuals.

Authors:  B Lesourd; W D Winters
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Immunotherapy in the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML): rationale, results and future prospects.

Authors:  D Urbanitz; T Büchner; H Pielken; J van de Loo
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1983-10-03

4.  Skin tests with autologous cholesteryl hemisuccinate treated tumour cells in cancer patients.

Authors:  M Munzarová; D Zemanová; J Kovarik; A Rejthar; Z Pacovsky
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 6.968

5.  Histological study on the fate of haptenated epidermal cells injected intradermally in guinea pigs.

Authors:  S Nakagawa; Y Takei; D Bang; Y Jinno; H Ueki
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.017

6.  Cellular immunity in congestive cardiomyopathy. The normal cellular immune response.

Authors:  P J Lowry; R A Thompson; W A Littler
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-04

7.  Immunosuppression in Kenyan visceral leishmaniasis.

Authors:  M Ho; D K Koech; D W Iha; A D Bryceson
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Delayed-hypersensitivity skin testing and childhood cancer.

Authors:  M Munzarová; A Kubíková-Kourilová; V Kolcová
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  A review of the leishmanin skin test: A neglected test for a neglected disease.

Authors:  Jessica Carstens-Kass; Kayla Paulini; Patrick Lypaczewski; Greg Matlashewski
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2021-07-22

10.  Nutritional status and general immune competence in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  G B Brookes; P Clifford
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 18.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.