Literature DB >> 378315

A comparison between disposable and non-disposable suction drainage units: a report of a controlled trial.

B J Britton, O J Gilmore, J S Lumley, W M Castleden.   

Abstract

A randomized trial of high vacuum Redivac drains and low vacuum Portovac drains has been conducted in 46 female patients undergoing simple mastectomy through a transverse skin incision. The Redivac units drained less fluid, stayed in place for a day less than the Portovac units and were emptied once less often.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1979        PMID： 378315     DOI： 10.1002/bjs.1800660420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN： 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  4 in total

1.  [The value of wound drainage with or without suction].

Authors:  J Schmidt; A Hasselbach; W Schnorr; T Baranek; R Letsch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Contamination of underwater seal drainage systems in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  P Hornick; L C John; J Wallis; V Wilkins; G M Rees; S J Edmondson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  [Pressure-volume analysis of wound suction drainage containers and suction capacity of drainage tubes].

Authors:  C Mohadjer; R Siegert; H Jäger; H Weidauer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1994

4.  Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: what we have learned in the last two decades.

Authors:  Vivek Srivastava; Somprakas Basu; Vijay Kumar Shukla
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.588
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.