Literature DB >> 3780330

Effect of mechanical ventilation on hepatic drug pharmacokinetics.

C Richard, A Berdeaux, F Delion, B Riou, A Rimailho, J F Giudicelli, P Auzépy.   

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation was able to induce a decrease in cardiac output and regional blood flow, especially hepatic flow. Thus, hepatic elimination of drugs with a high hepatic-extraction ratio, which was linked to alteration in hepatic blood flow, could be reduced during mechanical ventilation. The aim of this work was to determine the effect of mechanical ventilation on pharmacokinetic parameters of lidocaine, which is a well-known nonrestrictive elimination drug at the hepatic level. Five patients (mean age, 58 years) with normal hepatic function and quite similar gasometric parameters before and after weaning from mechanical ventilation were studied. With a washout period of 48 hours between mechanical ventilation and spontaneous ventilation, each patient was submitted to the following protocol: lidocaine in a bolus (1.5 mg/kg intravenously), followed by infusion (1.0 to 1.7 mg/min for 120 minutes). The results were that the peak plasma concentration after the bolus during mechanical ventilation was 3.22 +/- 0.37 mg/L (mean +/- SE) vs 2.40 +/- 0.35 mg/L during spontaneous ventilation (p less than 0.02). Steady-state plasma concentration during mechanical ventilation was 2.10 +/- 0.20 mg/L vs 1.64 +/- 0.16 mg/L during spontaneous ventilation (p less than 0.01). Total clearance was 604.2 +/- 87.0 ml/min during mechanical ventilation vs 775.0 +/- 112.1 ml/min during spontaneous ventilation (p less than 0.01). Elimination half-life was 245.2 +/- 50.6 minutes during mechanical ventilation vs 160.0 +/- 40.6 minutes during spontaneous ventilation (p less than 0.05). Distribution volume was 188.6 +/- 50.2 L during mechanical ventilation and 183.0 +/- 50.8 L during spontaneous ventilation (not significant). These preliminary data clearly demonstrated a decrease in lidocaine elimination in patients submitted to mechanical ventilation, but the magnitude of dosage adjustment of such a highly hepatic-extracted drug in patients submitted to mechanical ventilation remains to be investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3780330     DOI: 10.1378/chest.90.6.837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  11 in total

1.  Changes in gentamicin pharmacokinetic profiles induced by mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  C Triginer; I Izquierdo; R Fernández; J Torrent; S Benito; A Net; F Jane
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  PEEP and hepatic metabolic performance in septic shock.

Authors:  K Träger; P Radermacher; M Georgieff
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Amikacin in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Studies.

Authors:  Amélie Marsot; Romain Guilhaumou; Camille Riff; Olivier Blin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  The effect of respiratory disorders on clinical pharmacokinetic variables.

Authors:  A M Taburet; C Tollier; C Richard
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Postoperative pain in the neonate: age-related differences in morphine requirements and metabolism.

Authors:  Nancy J Bouwmeester; Wim C J Hop; Monique van Dijk; K J S Anand; John N van den Anker; Dick Tibboel
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Special considerations required for the formulation and administration of total parenteral nutrition therapy in the elderly patient.

Authors:  D F Driscoll; B R Bistrian
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Comparative population pharmacokinetics of lorazepam and midazolam during long-term continuous infusion in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Eleonora L Swart; Klaas P Zuideveld; Joost de Jongh; Meindert Danhof; Lambertus G Thijs; Robert M J Strack van Schijndel
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Effect of enteral versus parenteral feeding on hepatic blood flow and steady state propofol pharmacokinetics in ICU patients.

Authors:  N Van Brandt; P Hantson; Y Horsmans; P Mahieu; R K Verbeeck
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Dexmedetomidine in Infants.

Authors:  Rachel G Greenberg; Huali Wu; Matthew Laughon; Edmund Capparelli; Stevie Rowe; Kanecia O Zimmerman; P Brian Smith; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Pharmacokinetics Alterations of Midazolam Infusion versus Bolus Administration in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Taghi Beigmohammadi; Majid Hanifeh; Mohammad Reza Rouini; Behjat Sheikholeslami; Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.696

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.