Literature DB >> 3780080

Upper extremity proprioception in idiopathic scoliosis.

S D Cook, A F Harding, S W Burke, T S Whitecloud, R L Barrack, T M Leinhardt.   

Abstract

Twenty-three patients with idiopathic scoliosis were tested for upper extremity proprioceptive function. All subjects had documented progression of deformity, with an average curvature of 34 degrees. The average ages for scoliotics and 18 control subjects were 16.1 and 20.8 years, respectively. Controls had no spinal deformity and underwent identical test procedures. The test results showed that scoliotic subjects had significant asymmetry between right and left limbs in their threshold for detection of joint motion (p less than or equal to 0.005) and in their ability to reproduce angles to which their elbow joint had been previously positioned (p less than or equal to 0.025). Slight asymmetry also was observed in the reproduction tests of the control group (p less than or equal to 0.013); however, there was no significant asymmetry seen in this group for the threshold test. Performance of bilateral limbs was designated good and bad for both groups; the limb that performed better in proprioceptive function was designated good limb. Analysis of data showed that the scoliotics' good and bad limbs performed inferiorly in both threshold and angle reproduction tests when compared with normal controls. The results of this study imply, but do not localize, a neurologic deficit in scoliotic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3780080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  6 in total

1.  Abnormal activation of the motor cortical network in idiopathic scoliosis demonstrated by functional MRI.

Authors:  Julio Domenech; G García-Martí; L Martí-Bonmatí; C Barrios; J M Tormos; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Estimation of the centre of mass for the study of postural control in Idiopathic Scoliosis patients: a comparison of two techniques.

Authors:  Karl F Zabjek; Christine Coillard; Charles-H Rivard; François Prince
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Measuring and enhancing proprioception in musicians and dancers.

Authors:  Myrim Sillevis Smitt; H A Bird
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis as developmental instability.

Authors:  C J Goldberg; F E Dowling; E E Fogarty; D P Moore
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Motor cortical hyperexcitability in idiopathic scoliosis: could focal dystonia be a subclinical etiological factor?

Authors:  Julio Doménech; José María Tormos; Carlos Barrios; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparison of segmental spinal movement control in adolescents with and without idiopathic scoliosis using modified pressure biofeedback unit.

Authors:  Hong-Ji Luo; Shi-Xiang Lin; Shyi-Kuen Wu; Mei-Wun Tsai; Shwn-Jen Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.