Literature DB >> 3777331

Active observation in acute abdominal pain.

H J Thomson, P F Jones.   

Abstract

Only a minority of patients admitted with acute abdominal pain require urgent operation, but the identification of those who need an operation may be difficult. Many surgeons adopt a radical approach and operate when the diagnosis is doubtful, which often leads to 20 percent rate of negative findings on laparotomy. In this study, 220 patients of all ages admitted with acute abdominal pain were studied prospectively, and when the diagnosis on admission was uncertain, a policy of active observation was employed. In all, 39 percent of the patients underwent operation and only 5 percent had negative findings on laparotomy. No patient suffered as a result of this policy, which is recommended as a safe and effective approach to the management of acute abdominal pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3777331     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90220-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  11 in total

1.  Clinical judgment remains of great value in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Eric Bergeron
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis.

Authors:  Roland E Andersson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Which general surgical operations must be done at night?

Authors:  M McKee; P Priest; M Ginzler; N Black
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  [Strategy for avoidance of negative appendectomies].

Authors:  M N Wente; H Waleczek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Characteristics of perforated appendicitis: effect of delay is confounded by age and gender.

Authors:  Toms Augustin; Burt Cagir; Thomas J Vandermeer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation.

Authors:  R Andersson; A Hugander; A Thulin; P O Nyström; G Olaison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-08

7.  Epidemiology and outcomes of acute abdominal pain in a large urban Emergency Department: retrospective analysis of 5,340 cases.

Authors:  Gianfranco Cervellin; Riccardo Mora; Andrea Ticinesi; Tiziana Meschi; Ivan Comelli; Fausto Catena; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

8.  The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study.

Authors:  C L Temple; S A Huchcroft; W J Temple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Level of aggregation for optimal epidemiological analysis: the case of time to surgery and unnecessary removal of the normal appendix.

Authors:  S W Wen; K Demissie; D August; G G Rhoads
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Clinically monitored delay-A valid option in cases with doubtful diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Ajay Gupta; Subodh Regmi; Niranjan K Hazra; Moti L Panhani; Om P Talwar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 0.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.