Literature DB >> 3777293

Seat belt use laws and occupant crash protection in the United States.

A F Williams, A K Lund.   

Abstract

Current federal rule-making requires restraints such as air bags or automatic seat belts in new cars starting with model year 1987 unless states with two-thirds of the United States population enact seat belt use laws meeting certain criteria. Belt use laws have been enacted by 26 states and the District of Columbia as of July 1, 1986. The first laws to go into effect increased use from less than 20 per cent to 50-70 per cent in the first month; in most cases rates subsequently dropped to below 50 per cent. Texas has been an exception to this trend because it has had much tougher enforcement of its seat belt law than other states. This pattern is similar to the experience of Canadian provinces that passed laws in the mid-1970s; enforcement/publicity programs in Canada have produced belt use rates that are currently greater than 60 per cent. An enforcement program in Elmira, New York also increased use rates sharply. New York, which had the first and one of the strongest and most successful laws so far, had an estimated fatality reduction of 9 per cent during the first nine months of the law. It is likely that a 10 per cent reduction in fatalities is the maximum that can be expected from belt use laws without special enforcement efforts. Provision of automatic restraints in combination with belt use laws would greatly increase crash protection.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3777293      PMCID: PMC1646988          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.76.12.1438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  12 in total

1.  Age, period, and cohort effects in motor vehicle mortality in the United States, 1980-2010: the role of sex, alcohol involvement, and position in vehicle.

Authors:  James Macinko; Diana Silver; Jin Yung Bae
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2014-12-24

2.  Evaluation of the Think First head and spinal cord injury prevention program.

Authors:  M Wright; F P Rivara; D Ferse
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.399

3.  Homicide, suicide, motor vehicle crash, and fall mortality: United States' experience in comparative perspective.

Authors:  I R Rockett; G S Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Repeal of the Massachusetts seat belt law.

Authors:  R Hingson; S M Levenson; T Heeren; T Mangione; C Rodgers; T Schiavone; R P Hertz; T Schiavonnet
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Improving state health policy assessment: an agenda for measurement and analysis.

Authors:  James Macinko; Diana Silver
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Seat belt use on interstate highways.

Authors:  J K Wells; A F Williams; A K Lund
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Mortality from unintentional injuries in California, 1985.

Authors:  L D Saunders; M Green; G Doebbert; M A Pearson; K W Kizer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-04

8.  Safety behavior among Iowa junior high and high school students.

Authors:  M Schootman; L J Fuortes; C Zwerling; M A Albanese; C A Watson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Detection of injury-prone behaviors among internal medicine patients.

Authors:  D K Hunt; S R Lowenstein; R G Badgett; W M Marine; C J Garrett; J F Steiner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Understanding Policy Diffusion in the U.S.: An Information-Theoretical Approach to Unveil Connectivity Structures in Slowly Evolving Complex Systems.

Authors:  Ross P Anderson; Geronimo Jimenez; Jin Yung Bae; Diana Silver; James Macinko; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.