Literature DB >> 3772738

The impact of neglecting nonlinear plasma-protein binding on disopyramide bioavailability studies.

R A Upton, R L Williams.   

Abstract

Disopyramide has nonlinear protein binding and thus the relationship between the extent of its bioavailability and AUC, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve, is nonlinear and absorption rate-dependent. The unbound species follows linear pharmacokinetics. A solution of disopyramide, the innovator's product, and two generic formulations were found to be statistically indistinguishable in their bioavailability of disopyramide, whether comparison was based upon AUC or area under the plasma unbound concentration-time curve (AUCu). The AUC and AUCu gave similar results because of truly similar bioavailability, coupled with sufficiently similar release rates, among the four preparations chosen for study. The concentration dependence of disopyramide protein binding and the time course of unbound plasma concentrations were fit by models which then allowed prediction of AUC under various biopharmaceutical scenarios. Nonlinear binding of disopyramide to plasma proteins renders AUC an insensitive parameter for the discrimination of products with different extents of bioavailability; immediate-release products allowing bioavailabilities of 75 or 125% relative to the solution can generate AUCs 86 and 112%, respectively, of that from the solution. Nonlinear binding, furthermore, leads to a tendency for AUC to overestimate the bioavailability of slower release products in single-dose studies; if AUC were the index of bioavailability, products permitting the same bioavailability as the solution but releasing over 12 hr could appear to allow 114% relative bioavailability. Moreover, in some situations the bias arising from the insensitivity of AUC to product differences can be reinforced by the dependence of AUC on release rate; an apparent relative bioavailability of 80% can be achieved by a 12-hr release product allowing a true relative bioavailability of a mere 58%. While multiple-dose studies appear largely to avoid the tendency to overestimate low bioavailability in slow-release products, in these studies AUC appears to be even more insensitive in resolving discrepancies between products. Assay technology now available makes AUCu a feasible and more reliable index of bioavailability than AUC when plasma protein binding of drugs is nonlinear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3772738     DOI: 10.1007/bf01059197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  14 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of the antiarrhythmic disopyramide in healthy humans.

Authors:  P H Hinderling; E R Garrett
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1976-06

2.  A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.

Authors:  M M Bradford
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1976-05-07       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Role of concentration-dependent plasma protein binding in disopyramide disposition.

Authors:  P J Meffin; E W Robert; R A Winkle; S Harapat; F A Peters; D C Harrison
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1979-02

4.  Disopyramide pharmacokinetics and bioavailability.

Authors:  D K Dubetz; N N Brown; W D Hooper; M J Eadie; J H Tyrer
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of unbound disopyramide directly measured in serial plasma samples in man.

Authors:  M Thibonnier; N H Holford; R A Upton; C D Blume; R L Williams
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1984-12

6.  Critical evaluation of the potential error in pharmacokinetic studies of using the linear trapezoidal rule method for the calculation of the area under the plasma level--time curve.

Authors:  W L Chiou
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1978-12

7.  Effect of altered disopyramide binding on its pharmacologic response in rabbits.

Authors:  J D Huang; S Oie
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  A comparison of numerical integrating algorithms by trapezoidal, Lagrange, and spline approximation.

Authors:  K C Yeh; K C Kwan
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1978-02

9.  Concentration-dependence of disopyramide binding to plasma protein and its influence on kinetics and dynamics.

Authors:  J J Lima; H Boudoulas; M Blanford
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Enzyme immunoassay of disopyramide in serum.

Authors:  B E Pape
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pilsicainide in breast milk from a mother: comparison with disopyramide and propafenone.

Authors:  Michi Wakaumi; Shuichi Tsuruoka; Koichi Sakamoto; Tsuyoshi Shiga; Akio Fujimura
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Therapeutic drug monitoring in pregnancy: rationale and current status.

Authors:  C Knott; F Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Bioavailability of disopyramide in normal volunteers using unbound concentration.

Authors:  J Braun; F Sörgel; W P Gluth; S Oie
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  The assessment of bioavailability in the presence of nonlinear elimination.

Authors:  S D Hall; C B McAllister; G R Wilkinson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1988-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.