Literature DB >> 3772116

Automated monoclonal radioimmunoassays for pirenzepine, a selective muscarinic receptor antagonist, in plasma and urine.

P Tanswell, W Kasper, G Zahn.   

Abstract

Sensitive and specific monoclonal radioimmunoassays (RIA) for pirenzepine, a muscarinic receptor (M1) antagonist, were developed and validated for rapid automated routine analysis of plasma and urine samples from clinical studies. Three discrete stable hybridoma clones secreting monoclonal antibodies (MAb) to pirenzepine were produced by fusing the myeloma line X63-Ag8.653 to spleen cells of BALB/c mice immunized with pirenzepine-5-N-propionate-protein conjugates. Of three carrier proteins investigated (HSA, BSA and edestin), optimal humoral immune responses and affinity of hybridoma antibody were attained using HSA. All three MAb displayed high affinity to pirenzepine (Ka = 0.6-1.2 X 10(9) l/mol) but showed differing cross-reactivities with its 4'-N-desmethyl metabolite (less than 1%, 6% and 40% respectively). The MAb with essentially zero metabolite cross-reactivity, 58-7/7, was selected for RIA development. In comparison, eight rabbit polyclonal antisera raised against pirenzepine-5-N-propionate-HSA or pirenzepine-5-N-butyrate-HSA possessed a similar range of affinities to the MAbs, but none approached MAb 58-7/7 in specificity. The bridge length had no significant effect on antisera characteristics. Competitive solid-phase RIAs for pirenzepine in human plasma and urine were established using MAb 58-7/7 and [3H]pirenzepine as tracer. All fluid transfers were automated using a programmable sample processing system (Microlab 2,000). Detection limits were 0.25 ng/ml (plasma) and 4 ng/ml (urine) in 0.1 ml sample. The coefficient of within-assay variation was 4% or better in the range 2-100 ng/ml (plasma) or 30-1,000 ng/ml (urine), the between-assay CV was 5.3% or better in the range 5-90 ng/ml (plasma) or 40-660 ng/ml (urine). Excellent correlation was observed between the plasma monoclonal RIA and the hitherto used polyclonal RIA (n = 106, r = 0.994), and between the urine monoclonal RIA and HPLC (n = 82, r = 0.998). We expect that these assays will prove valuable in pharmacokinetic and pharmacological investigations of pirenzepine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3772116     DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(86)90197-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Methods        ISSN: 0022-1759            Impact factor:   2.303


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of drugs used in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases (Part II).

Authors:  K Lauritsen; L S Laursen; J Rask-Madsen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Influence of ranitidine, pirenzepine, and aluminum magnesium hydroxide on the bioavailability of various antibiotics, including amoxicillin, cephalexin, doxycycline, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid.

Authors:  K M Deppermann; H Lode; G Höffken; G Tschink; C Kalz; P Koeppe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Absolute bioavailability of pirenzepine in intensive care patients.

Authors:  P Tanswell; F Hofgärtner; G Bozler; H Giesler; G Allmendinger; E Schmid
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Steady-state intravenous pharmacokinetics of pirenzepine in patients with differing degrees of renal dysfunction.

Authors:  B Krakamp; P Tanswell; H Vogel; G Bozler
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Steady-state intravenous pharmacokinetics of pirenzepine in patients with hepatic insufficiency and combined renal- and hepatic insufficiency.

Authors:  B Krakamp; P Tanswell; P Leidig; H Vogel; R Schmitz; G Bozler
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in man simulating acute and chronic treatment with oral pirenzepine.

Authors:  W Londong; V Londong; C Federle; P Tanswell; U Voderholzer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Telenzepine is at least 25 times more potent than pirenzepine--a dose response and comparative secretory study in man.

Authors:  W Londong; V Londong; A Meierl; U Voderholzer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 23.059

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.