Literature DB >> 3771596

Failure of stabilization of the spine with methylmethacrylate. A retrospective analysis of twenty-four cases.

P C McAfee, H H Bohlman, T Ducker, F J Eismont.   

Abstract

Twenty-four patients who had a major complication after attempted stabilization of the spine with methylmethacrylate were referred for treatment. The initial instability that necessitated stabilization was caused by a traumatic condition in fifteen of these patients and by a metastatic tumor in nine. The average length of time before failure of fixation was 208.3 days for the patients who had a traumatic condition and 193.7 days for those who had a neoplasm. In eleven patients a progressive neural deficit developed postoperatively, and in six others the recovery of neural function was possibly hindered by the cement. A deep wound infection developed in six patients, and in five of them treatment by removal of the methylmethacrylate and metal, followed by a prolonged period of cervical traction, was required. Loosening and failure of fixation was the most common complication--it occurred in twelve of the fifteen patients who had a traumatic lesion and in eight of the nine who had a neoplasm. Salvage operations that included removal of the cement and conventional bone-grafting procedures were performed in eleven of the twelve patients who had loosening associated with a traumatic lesion and in six of the eight who had loosening and a tumor. Stability was restored in every patient. Improved long-term results can be achieved by using grafts of iliac bone and triple-wire stabilization methods (a midline wiring between the spinous processes and two iliac-crest grafts, one on each side, wired to the posterior elements) instead of methacrylate in the primary treatment of traumatic injuries. The treatment of choice for instability caused by neoplastic destruction of two or more vertebral bodies includes a construct of methylmethacrylate anteriorly. However, if cement is used, early augmentation with posterior fusion of the spine and stabilization should be considered. As a rule, combined anterior and posterior stabilization is recommended for the reconstruction of a spine that is unstable due to neoplastic destruction. In general, whenever methylmethacrylate is used for spinal stabilization, it should be augmented with grafts of iliac bone to provide long-term stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3771596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  12 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine metastases: techniques for anterior reconstruction and stabilization.

Authors:  Christina M Sayama; Meic H Schmidt; Erica F Bisson
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Vertebral body replacement with homologous femoral head transplants.

Authors:  P Griss; M Pfeiffer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Surgical management of spinal mesenchymal tumors.

Authors:  Milan G Mody; Ganesh Rao; Laurence D Rhines
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Suction/irrigation for deep wound infection after spinal instrumentation: a case study.

Authors:  K Ido; K Shimizu; Y Nakayama; J Shikata; M Matsushita; T Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Anterior rib strut grafting for the treatment of malignant lesions in the thoracic spine.

Authors:  T Shirakusa; R Motonaga; K Yoshimine; S Takada; H Ueda; S Yamasaki; T Takachi; S Yoh
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Heat generation and heat protection in methylmethacrylate cementation of vertebral bodies. A cadaver study evaluating different clinical possibilities of dural protection from heat during cement curing.

Authors:  S Toksvig-Larsen; R Johnsson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The acrylic-wire option in cervical spine fixation. A retrospective study.

Authors:  A Raco; N Di Lorenzo; R Delfini; P Ciappetta; G Cantore
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Distractible vertebral body replacement in patients with malignant vertebral destruction or osteoporotic burst fractures.

Authors:  Torsten Kluba; Johannes P Giehl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Craniocervical junction malformation treated by transoral approach. A survey of 25 cases with emphasis on postoperative instability and outcome.

Authors:  N Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Treatment of metastatic disease of the spine with anterior resection and stabilization by means of a new cancellous metal construct. A preliminary report.

Authors:  H Waisbrod
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1988
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.