Literature DB >> 3769903

Mechanical efficiency in rowing.

T Fukunaga, A Matsuo, K Yamamoto, T Asami.   

Abstract

Five university oarsmen participated in a determination of mechanical efficiency when rowing in a tank. In the tank, water was circulated at 3 m X s-1 by a motor driven pump. The subjects rowed with the stepwise incremental loading, in which the intensity increased by 10% of the maximum force of rowing (maxFc) every 2 min. Power (WO) was calculated from the force applied to the oarlock pin (FC) and its angular displacement (theta H). Oxygen uptake and heart rate were measured every 30 s during rowing. Anaerobic threshold (AT) was determined from expired gas variables by Wasserman's method. AT of oarsmen was 74.6 +/- 6.01% as a percentage of VO2max. As the displacement of the handgrip in the stroke was independent of WO, the increment of WO was caused by the increase of both FC and stroke frequency. Gross efficiency without base-line correction (GE) increased with FC with low intensities of rowing. In the region of 124-182 W of WO GE was almost constant at 17.5%. Efficiency was 19.8 +/- 1.4%, with resting metabolism as base-line correction (net efficiency), and 27.5 +/- 2.9% when using the unloaded rowing as the base-line correction (work efficiency), and 22.8 +/- 2.2% when calculating the work rate as the base-line correction (delta efficiency).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3769903     DOI: 10.1007/bf00421639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  10 in total

1.  Cardiorespiratory response to exercise on a rowing and bicycle ergometer.

Authors:  D A Cunningham; P B Goode; J B Critz
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1975

2.  Muscular efficiency during steady-rate exercise: effects of speed and work rate.

Authors:  G A Gaesser; G A Brooks
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  The efficiency of anaerobical work.

Authors:  E HOHWU CHRISTENSEN; P HOGBERG
Journal:  Arbeitsphysiologie       Date:  1950

4.  Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; M Kaneko
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Anaerobic threshold and respiratory gas exchange during exercise.

Authors:  K Wasserman; B J Whipp; S N Koyl; W L Beaver
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 3.531

6.  Utilization of muscle elasticity in exercise.

Authors:  H Thys; T Faraggiana; R Margaria
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Physiological aspects of rowing.

Authors:  P E Di Prampero; G Cortili; F Celentano; P Cerretelli
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 3.531

8.  Efficiency of muscular work.

Authors:  B J Whipp; K Wasserman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 3.531

9.  Anaerobic threshold measurements of elite oarsmen.

Authors:  T C Mickelson; F C Hagerman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Energy expenditure during simulated rowing.

Authors:  F C Hagerman; M C Connors; J A Gault; G R Hagerman; W J Polinski
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1978-07
  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Reliability of measurement of oxygen uptake by a portable telemetric system.

Authors:  Y Kawakami; D Nozaki; A Matsuo; T Fukunaga
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Over 50 Years of Researching Force Profiles in Rowing: What Do We Know?

Authors:  John Warmenhoven; Stephen Cobley; Conny Draper; Richard Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Physiological and biomechanical aspects of rowing. Implications for training.

Authors:  N H Secher
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Human temperature regulation under heat stress in health, disease, and injury.

Authors:  Matthew N Cramer; Daniel Gagnon; Orlando Laitano; Craig G Crandall
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 46.500

5.  Is the Most Commonly Used Strategy for the First 1,500 m of a 2,000 m Rowing Ergometer Race the Most Appropriate?

Authors:  Alice Boillet; Bastien Haas; Pierre Samozino; Baptiste Morel; Maximilien Bowen; Caroline Cohen; Laurent A Messonnier
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.