Literature DB >> 3769602

Children's learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: studies of proximal development.

R A Ferrara, A L Brown, J C Campione.   

Abstract

An initial study examined the relation between current developmental levels, as estimated by IQ, and proximal levels of development, as estimated by the efficiency of learning and transfer in assisted contexts. 8-11-year-old children learned to solve letter series completion problems with the aid of graduated sequences of prompts. Maintenance and transfer were later assessed using similar prompting procedures. Both IQ and age effects were found. Average-IQ (and younger) children required more assistance than high-IQ (and older) children to achieve the same mastery level on the original problem types. In addition to this difference in learning efficiency, average-versus high-IQ students, and younger versus older children, subsequently diverged in the number of prompts they needed as the transfer problems differed increasingly from the ones originally learned. In a second study, amount of assistance required in learning was found to be quite stable across moderately related tasks (letter series and progressive matrices). Assistance needed in maintenance and transfer appeared less stable but was also significantly correlated across tasks. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3769602     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00438.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  6 in total

1.  Dynamic Assessment of Algebraic Learning in Predicting Third Graders' Development of Mathematical Problem Solving.

Authors:  Lynn S Fuchs; Donald L Compton; Douglas Fuchs; Kurstin N Hollenbeck; Caitlin F Craddock; Carol L Hamlett
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2008-11

2.  Predicting First Graders' Development of Calculation versus Word-Problem Performance: The Role of Dynamic Assessment.

Authors:  Pamela M Seethaler; Lynn S Fuchs; Douglas Fuchs; Donald L Compton
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2012-02

3.  Two-stage screening for math problem-solving difficulty using dynamic assessment of algebraic learning.

Authors:  Lynn S Fuchs; Donald L Compton; Douglas Fuchs; Kurstin N Hollenbeck; Carol L Hamlett; Pamela M Seethaler
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2011-06-17

4.  Validating dynamic assessment of triadic gaze for young children with severe disabilities.

Authors:  Lesley B Olswang; Julie L Feuerstein; Gay Lloyd Pinder; Patricia Dowden
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Progression and individual differences in children's series completion after dynamic testing.

Authors:  Kirsten W J Touw; Bart Vogelaar; Floor Thissen; Sanne Rovers; Wilma C M Resing
Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol       Date:  2019-03-13

6.  Does the Value of Dynamic Assessment in Predicting End-of-First-Grade Mathematics Performance Differ as a Function of English Language Proficiency?

Authors:  Pamela M Seethaler; Lynn S Fuchs; Douglas Fuchs; Donald L Compton
Journal:  Elem Sch J       Date:  2016-11-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.