Literature DB >> 3768203

Oral versus intravenous AHPrBP (APD) in the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy.

D Thiébaud, L Portmann, P Jaeger, A F Jacquet, P Burckhardt.   

Abstract

Twenty patients with malignant hypercalcemia were treated with aminohydroxypropylidene bisphosphonate (AHPrBP, previously APD) a potent inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. To assess the efficacy of oral vs intravenous therapy, the patients were divided into two groups: group A received AHPrBP intravenously (30 mg/day), and group B received the drug orally (1200 mg/day) for 6 days. In both groups all the patients responded to AHPrBP with a rapid decrease in plasma calcium concentration after a mean time lag of 1 day. Within 9 days plasma calcium concentration fell from 3.42 +/- 0.13 (mean +/- SEM) to 2.26 +/- 0.13 mmol/l in group A and from 3.28 +/- 0.12 to 2.24 +/- 0.09 mmol/l in group B. There was no significant difference in plasma Ca level between both groups on days 4, 6, and 9, and plasma Ca was within the normal range in all patients on day 9. On both treatment regimens urinary calcium excretion fell dramatically and similarly. Plasma phosphate concentration decreased significantly on AHPrBP in both groups of patients, reaching values slightly below the normal range from day 4 to day 9. TmP/GFR decreased progressively on AHPrBP. However, this decrement was significant at day 6 only. Plasma parathyroid hormone concentration rose significantly in both groups from day 4 to day 9. We conclude that at the doses used in the present study treatment of tumor-induced hypercalcemia with AHPrBP is equally effective whether given orally or intravenously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3768203     DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(86)90203-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  10 in total

Review 1.  Bisphosphonates. Pharmacology and use in the treatment of tumour-induced hypercalcaemic and metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  H Fleisch
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Severe reaction to diphosphonate.

Authors:  R E Gray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-22

3.  Leukaemia-associated hypercalcaemia in a 10-year-old boy: effectiveness of aminohydroxypropylidene biphosphonate.

Authors:  B R Boudailliez; B J Pautard; J L Sebert; O Kremp; C X Piussan
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  Comparative tolerability of drug therapies for hypercalcaemia of malignancy.

Authors:  N Zojer; A V Keck; M Pecherstorfer
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Medical management of hypercalcaemia.

Authors:  S H Ralston
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Pamidronate. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in resorptive bone disease.

Authors:  A Fitton; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Hypercalcaemia of malignancy.

Authors:  P J Kelly; J A Eisman
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 8.  Hypercalcemia in malignancy.

Authors:  G J Strewler; R A Nissenson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-12

9.  Differential action of pamidronate on trabecular and cortical bone in women with involutional osteoporosis.

Authors:  G A Fromm; E Vega; L Plantalech; A M Galich; C A Mautalen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Tolerability of different dosing regimens of bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis and malignant bone disease.

Authors:  Raja S Bobba; Karen Beattie; Bill Parkinson; Dinesh Kumbhare; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.228

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.