Literature DB >> 3766692

Objective measurement of binocular fixation misalignment.

A Remole, S M Code, C E Matyas, M A McLeod, D J White.   

Abstract

The amount of deviation from central fixation during binocular fusion of a vertical border was compared with conventional fixation disparity measured at the same time, forced convergence serving as the independent variable. Fixation eccentricity was measured objectively by monitoring a scleral blood vessel with a video camera and by analyzing the movement, greatly magnified, on a video screen. Fixation disparity was measured conventionally by interocular nonius alignment of vertically dissociated line segments. The results agree well with previous comparisons of these responses, in which the fixation eccentricity was measured by using a technique based on the effect of retinal stimulus location on border enhancement. As in the previous experiment, the fixation misalignment was found to be many times larger than the corresponding disparity for most forced convergence values. The large discrepancy between actual fixation misalignment and fixation disparity has thus been documented objectively as well as subjectively.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3766692     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198608000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0093-7002


  2 in total

1.  Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Individual objective versus subjective fixation disparity as a function of forced vergence.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.