Literature DB >> 3766637

The preterm cervix and preterm labor: relative risks, predictive values, and change over time.

T M Stubbs, J P Van Dorsten, M C Miller.   

Abstract

The accurate prediction and diagnosis of preterm labor continue to frustrate the clinician. This is partly due to a scarcity of cervical data from the early third trimester. A total of 760 prospective, serial, paired, and blinded pelvic examinations were done at 28 to 34 weeks of gestation for 191 patients without a history of preterm labor. If the cervix was dilated greater than or equal to 1 cm (internal os) or effaced greater than 30%, the relative risk of preterm labor was increased to 1.8 to 4.2. Negative predictive values for cervical status were greater than 92%, but positive predictive values were less than or equal to 18%. Change over time was unusual (dilatation increase greater than or equal to 1 cm or effacement increase greater than or equal to 40%), suggesting that a baseline late second-trimester examination could assist in the early but accurate diagnosis of preterm labor should it be suspected later in gestation. These data suggest that even in the low-risk patient, an early cervical examination could be beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3766637     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(86)80031-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  3 in total

Review 1.  Management of preterm labour.

Authors:  S Vause; T Johnston
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Serum prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGFM) and oxytocin levels correlate with sonographic changes in the cervix in patients with preterm labor.

Authors:  N Vavra; W Eppel; P Sevelda; R Fitz; A R Fuchs; F Fuchs; P Husslein
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Preterm prediction study: comparison of the cervical score and Bishop score for prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery.

Authors:  R B Newman; R L Goldenberg; J D Iams; P J Meis; B M Mercer; A H Moawad; E Thom; M Miodovnik; S N Caritis; M Dombrowski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.661

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.