Literature DB >> 3766514

Errors in reported dietary intakes. I. Short-term recall.

M L Wu, A S Whittemore, D L Jung.   

Abstract

Measures for quantifying reproducibility and between-subject variability of nutrient intake data are applied to intakes reported in two interviews (1-3 months apart) by 44 male and 17 female healthy white subjects aged 45-75 years. Intakes were assessed by three methods: a dietary history that included consumption frequency and serving size for 71 food items (dietary history method); a combination of individual consumption frequencies with sex-specific mean serving sizes (frequency method); an extrapolation from frequencies and serving sizes of all foods reported for a "typical day" in the specified time period (typical day method). Intake variation within subjects, between subjects, and between methods was assessed by analysis of variance for each sex and for each of the nutrients: total calories, protein, fat, vitamin A, and protein and fat as percentage of total calories. Dietary history-assessed intakes exceeded those assessed by the other two methods. The dietary history versus frequency excess was greater than the dietary history versus typical day excess for calories, fat, and protein, while the reverse was true for vitamin A and fat as percentage of total calories. The typical day method was unreliable for vitamin A because it occasionally produced extremely high, unreproducible intakes. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to measure a method's ability to distinguish interpersonal variation from within-person error. The frequency method produced less within-person error than did the dietary history method for all nutrients. For absolute intakes, the frequency method produced less interpersonal variation than did the dietary history method, while for relative intakes, the reverse was true. Females reported intakes with less within-person error than did males, and the interpersonal spread of their intakes was smaller. Consequences of these findings for the power and sensitivity of studies on the role of dietary factors in the etiology of chronic disease are explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3766514     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  4 in total

1.  Perspective: Randomized Controlled Trials Are Not a Panacea for Diet-Related Research.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Edward A Frongillo; Swann A Adams; Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Thomas G Hurley; Donald R Miller; Ira S Ockene
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Comparison of diet history interview and self completed questionnaire in assessment of diet in an elderly population.

Authors:  N Jackson; J Little; A D Wilson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Effects of a healthy food supply intervention in a military setting: positive changes in cereal, fat and sugar containing foods.

Authors:  Clarissa M L Bingham; Marjaana Lahti-Koski; Pauli Puukka; Marja Kinnunen; Piia Jallinoja; Pilvikki Absetz
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  Reproducibility of dietary and other data from a self-administered questionnaire.

Authors:  S Tokunaga; T Hirohata; I Hirohata
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.