Literature DB >> 3763364

The effect of viewing position on the perceived layout of space.

R C Toye.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1986        PMID： 3763364     DOI： 10.3758/bf03208187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN： 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

Review 1.  EXAMINATION OF GIBSON'S PSYCHOPHYSICAL HYPOTHESIS.

Authors:  W EPSTEIN; J PARK
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Motion parallax as a determinant of perceived depth.

Authors:  E J GIBSON; J J GIBSON; O W SMITH; H FLOCK
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-07

3.  Factors influencing thresholds for monocular movement parallax.

Authors:  C H GRAHAM; K E BAKER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-06

4.  Perceived size and distance in visual space.

Authors:  A S GILINSKY
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Optical motions as information for unsigned depth.

Authors:  J M Farber; A B McConkie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  A comparison of oculomotor and motion parallax cues of egocentric distance.

Authors:  W C Gogel; J D Tietz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Evidence against visual integration across saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  D E Irwin; S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-07

8.  Visual images preserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; T M Ball; B J Reiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The effects of binocular and motion-generated information on the perception of depth and height.

Authors:  M A Hagen; M Teghtsoonian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-09

10.  Cognitive maps in children and men.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; H L Pick; G R Fariello
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1974-09
View more
  15 in total

1.  Dissociation between location and shape in visual space.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; John W Philbeck; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Properties of spatial representations: data from sighted and blind subjects.

Authors:  R N Haber; L R Haber; C A Levin; R Hollyfield
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-07

3.  Visual angle as a determinant of perceived interobject distance.

Authors:  C A Levin; R N Haber
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-08

4.  On the anisotropy of perceived ground extents and the interpretation of walked distance as a measure of perception.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Emily Sun; Cassandra J Strawser; Ariana Spiegel; Brennan Klein; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Population coding of visual space: modeling.

Authors:  Sidney R Lehky; Anne B Sereno
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Population coding of visual space: comparison of spatial representations in dorsal and ventral pathways.

Authors:  Anne B Sereno; Sidney R Lehky
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Perceived azimuth direction is exaggerated: Converging evidence from explicit and implicit measures.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Failures of stereoscopic shape constancy over changes of viewing distance and size for bilaterally symmetric polyhedra.

Authors:  Ying Yu; James T Todd; Alexander A Petrov
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Anisotropic perception of slant from texture gradient: Size contrast hypothesis.

Authors:  Atsuki Higashiyama; Tadashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  A catch-up illusion arising from a distance-dependent perception bias in judging relative movement.

Authors:  Tobias Meilinger; Bärbel Garsoffky; Stephan Schwan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.