Literature DB >> 3762474

Smokers' understandings of cigarette yield labels.

S Chapman, D Wilson, M Wakefield.   

Abstract

An important part of public health policy on the control of smoking is the promotion of a reduction in intake of tar by persons who continue to smoke. One method that may contribute towards such a reduction is to encourage smokers to choose cigarette brands that contain low tar levels. This in turn might be promoted by the comprehensible labelling of cigarette packets with tar yields. We tested our hypothesis that the current information about tar yield on cigarette packets is incomprehensible to smokers on a sample of 498 persons (original sample, 500) who smoked. Only 10 (2%) smokers were able to state the correct tar content of their cigarette. On a scaled range of tar levels in all cigarette brands that are available in Australia, 344 (69.1%) smokers underestimated the level in their cigarette brand. On this scale, 280 (56%) smokers placed randomly chosen tar levels in the wrong category. It was agreed by 360 (72%) smokers that comparative tar yields should be displayed at all points of tobacco sale. It is recommended that a condition of issuing a licence to retail tobacco should be that the tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yield information for all cigarette brands that are available in a national market should be displayed prominently to the consumer by the retailer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3762474     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1986.tb112389.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  8 in total

1.  The news on smoking: newspaper coverage of smoking and health in Australia, 1987-88.

Authors:  S Chapman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Information on tar and nicotine yields on cigarette packages.

Authors:  R M Davis; P Healy; S A Hawk
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Tobacco packaging and labeling policies under the U.S. Tobacco Control Act: research needs and priorities.

Authors:  David Hammond
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Smokers' knowledge and understanding of advertised tar numbers: health policy implications.

Authors:  J B Cohen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Measurement of self reported active exposure to cigarette smoke.

Authors:  J F Etter; T V Perneger
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 6.  Tobacco and nicotine product testing.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Lois Biener; Scott J Leischow; Mitch R Zeller
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Evaluation of strategies to communicate harmful and potentially harmful constituent (HPHC) information through cigarette package inserts: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Jordan J Louviere; Kayla R Getz; Farahnaz Islam; Dien Anshari; Yoojin Cho; Richard J O'Connor; David Hammond; James F Thrasher
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 6.953

Review 8.  Tobacco packaging and mass media campaigns: research needs for Articles 11 and 12 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Authors:  David Hammond; Melanie Wakefield; Sarah Durkin; Emily Brennan
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.