Literature DB >> 375848

Indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis: clinical effects, pharmacokinetics, and platelet studies in responders and nonresponders.

N Baber, L D Halliday, W J van den Heuvel, R W Walker, R Sibeon, J P Keenan, T Littler, M L Orme.   

Abstract

Twenty patients with definite or classical rheumatoid arthritis entered and completed a sequential study of placebo for 1 week, oral indomethacin 25 mg 3 times a day for 3 weeks, and oral indomethacin 25 mg 3 times a day plus 100 mg indomethacin suppository at night for 3 weeks. Twelve of the patients had previously been classified as responders and eight as nonresponders to indomethacin by an independent assessor. At the end of each period patients were assessed by a blind observer for duration of morning stiffness, pain score, digital joint size, grip strength, articular index, analgesic tablet usage, and the patient's own overall global assessment and comparative global assessment. In 8 of the 9 tests used responders improved on indomethacin in comparison with placebo, while nonresponders did not improve. There were no significant differences between responders and nonresponders in the plasma half-life, plasma clearance of indomethacin, protein binding of indomethacin, or urinary excretion of free or conjugated indomethacin. There were no significant differences between responders and nonresponders in the urinary excretion of 7HDPA or in the platelet aggregation or platelet malonyldialdehyde production tests. In responders there was a significant positive correlation between the plasma indomethacin concentration (r=0.44, P<0.05) and the percentage inhibition of malonyldialdehyde production by the platelets. However, in nonresponders this correlation, while significant (P<0.05), was negative (r=-0.498). Both for responders and nonresponders there was a significant correlation between plasma indomethacin concentration and the percentage reduction in 7HDPA. There was no correlation between the clinical response and the plasma concentration of indomethacin. There appears to be a biochemical difference between responders and nonresponders, which, while not necessarily causally linked with the clinical response to indomethacin, is worthy of further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 375848      PMCID: PMC1000336          DOI: 10.1136/ard.38.2.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  10 in total

1.  DIAGNOSTIC criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: 1958 revision by a committee of the American Rheumatism Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Rapid determination of salicylate in biological fluids.

Authors:  P TRINDER
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Clinical studies with an articular index for the assessment of joint tenderness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D M Ritchie; J A Boyle; J M McInnes; M K Jasani; T G Dalakos; P Grieveson; W W Buchanan
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1968-07

4.  Clinical measurement of the anti-inflammatory effects of salicylates in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  P L Boardman; F D Hart
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1967-11-04

5.  Interactions of drugs with proteins. II. Experimental methods, treatment of experimental data, and thermodynamics of binding reactions of thymoleptic drugs and model dyes.

Authors:  J H Weder; M H Bickel
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 3.534

6.  Pharmacokinetics of indomethacin.

Authors:  G Alván; M Orme; L Bertilsson; R Ekstrand; L Palmér
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Four new anti-inflammatory drugs: responses and variations.

Authors:  E C Huskisson; D L Woolf; H W Balme; J Scott; S Franklin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-05-01

8.  Quantitative gas-liquid chromatographic method for the determination of indomethacin in biological fluids.

Authors:  R G Sibeon; J D Baty; N Baber; K Chan; M L Orme
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1978-06-01

9.  The interaction between indomethacin and probenecid. A clinical and pharmacokinetic study.

Authors:  N Baber; L Halliday; R Sibeon; T Littler; M L Orme
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Defective platelet lipid peroxidation in myeloproliferative disorders: a possible defect of prostaglandin synthesis.

Authors:  J P Keenan; J Wharton; A J Shepherd; A J Bellingham
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 6.998

  10 in total
  24 in total

Review 1.  Choosing the right nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug for the right patient: a pharmacokinetic approach.

Authors:  N M Davies; N M Skjodt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Which Anti-inflammatory?

Authors:  W G Bensen; M A Bridge
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Variations in response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  R O Day; P M Brooks
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Variability in response to NSAIDs. Fact or fiction?

Authors:  R O Day; G G Graham; K M Williams; P M Brooks
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Correlation plasma levels, NSAID and therapeutic response.

Authors:  J P Famaey
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  The effects of indomethacin on serum gastrin concentrations.

Authors:  M L Orme; G J Dockray; N Baber; R G Sibeon; L D Halliday; T R Littler
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 7.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in perisurgical pain management. Mechanisms of action and rationale for optimum use.

Authors:  J Cashman; G McAnulty
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics of indomethacin.

Authors:  L Helleberg
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Variability in response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics: evidence from controlled clinical therapeutic trial of flurbiprofen in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  S J Preston; M H Arnold; E M Beller; P M Brooks; W W Buchanan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 10.  The problems and pitfalls of NSAID therapy in the elderly (Part II).

Authors:  A G Johnson; R O Day
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.