Literature DB >> 3757187

Prognostic significance of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation induced at programmed stimulation and delayed potentials detected on the signal-averaged electrocardiograms of survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

A R Denniss, D A Richards, D V Cody, P A Russell, A A Young, M J Cooper, D L Ross, J B Uther.   

Abstract

The relative prognostic significance of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation inducible at programmed stimulation within 1 month of acute myocardial infarction was compared in a prospective study of 403 clinically well survivors of transmural infarction who were 65 years old or younger. The prognostic significance of delayed potentials on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram was also examined in a subset of 306 patients without bundle branch block. Among the study patients, 20% had inducible ventricular tachycardia, 14% had inducible ventricular fibrillation, and 66% had no inducible arrhythmias. The 2 year probability of remaining free from cardiac death or nonfatal ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation was 0.73 for those with inducible ventricular tachycardia, 0.93 for those with inducible ventricular fibrillation, and 0.92 for those with no inducible arrhythmias. The cycle length of inducible ventricular tachycardia was 230 msec or more in 70% of the patients with inducible tachycardia who died. Of the patients studied by signal-averaged electrocardiography, 26% had delayed potentials. At 2 years, the probability of remaining free from cardiac death or nonfatal ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation was 0.73 for patients with delayed potentials and 0.95 for patients with no delayed potentials. There was a significant correlation (p less than .001) between the presence of delayed potentials and the ability to induce ventricular tachycardia. In conclusion, in survivors of recent infarction who have not had spontaneous ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, inducible tachycardia (but not inducible fibrillation) at programmed stimulation predicts a significant risk of death or spontaneous tachycardia or fibrillation. A similar risk is found for patients with delayed potentials on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3757187     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.74.4.731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  19 in total

Review 1.  Other primary prevention trials-what is clinically and economically necessary?

Authors:  D S Cannom
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  [Functional late potential analysis in the 24-hour electrocardiogram].

Authors:  P Steinbigler; R Haberl; J Vogel; I Schmücking; A Spiegl; G Steinbeck
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-12

3.  The authors reply.

Authors:  A K Bhandari
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-12

4.  Effect of parasympathetic blockade on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram.

Authors:  E H Christiansen; O Frøbert
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.435

5.  Time course of ventricular arrhythmias and the signal averaged electrocardiogram in the post-infarction period: a prospective study of correlation.

Authors:  G Turitto; E B Caref; G Macina; J M Fontaine; S N Ursell; N el-Sherif
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-07

Review 6.  Ventricular arrhythmias in congestive heart failure: clinical significance and management.

Authors:  G R Khoshnevis; A Massumi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1999

7.  Implications for present and future applications of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator resulting from the use of a simple model of cost efficacy.

Authors:  M H Anderson; A J Camm
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-01

8.  Risk factors and stratification for sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  B J Maron; F Cecchi; W J McKenna
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-12

9.  Is the change of late potential over time related to enzyme levels? Ischemic burden in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Namik Kemal Eryol; Ramazan Topsakal; Abdurrahman Oguzhan; Adnan Abaci; Emrullah Başar; Ali Ergin; Servet Cetin
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.468

10.  High gain signal averaged electrocardiogram combined with 24 hour monitoring in patients early after myocardial infarction for bedside prediction of arrhythmic events.

Authors:  T Cripps; E D Bennett; A J Camm; D E Ward
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.