Literature DB >> 3753108

Necropsy evidence of detection bias in the diagnosis of lung cancer.

M J McFarlane, A R Feinstein, C K Wells.   

Abstract

The correct diagnosis had not been made during life in 26% of 153 patients with lung cancer found in necropsies performed between 1971 and 1982. The likelihood of a correct antemortem diagnosis showed distinctive gradients in relation to the patients' history and amount of cigarette smoking, symptomatic manifestations, and anatomic extensiveness of the cancers. However, cigarette smoking still exerted a diagnostic effect in patients with similar symptoms and similar degrees of anatomic spread. Furthermore, if a lesion was present, chest films were more likely to be radiologically interpreted as a cancer in smokers. The results suggest that smokers receive preferential consideration regarding the diagnosis of lung cancer. This detection bias can have adverse scientific consequences in depriving nonsmokers of suitable therapy, in leading to falsely high estimates of the true magnitude of the smoking/lung cancer association, and in distracting etiologic attention from other agents that may cause lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3753108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  5 in total

Review 1.  Differences in clinical communication by gender.

Authors:  V Elderkin-Thompson; H Waitzkin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  National Lung Cancer Screening Trial American College of Radiology Imaging Network Specimen Biorepository originating from the Contemporary Screening for the Detection of Lung Cancer Trial (NLST, ACRIN 6654): design, intent, and availability of specimens for validation of lung cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Edward F Patz; Neil E Caporaso; Steven M Dubinett; Pierre P Massion; Fred R Hirsch; John D Minna; Constantine Gatsonis; Fenghai Duan; Amanda Adams; Charles Apgar; Rosa M Medina; Denise R Aberle
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward F Patz; Paul Pinsky; Constantine Gatsonis; Jorean D Sicks; Barnett S Kramer; Martin C Tammemägi; Caroline Chiles; William C Black; Denise R Aberle
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Causes and consequences of the opioid epidemic in the Netherlands: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ajda Bedene; Eveline L A van Dorp; Tariq Faquih; Suzanna C Cannegieter; Dennis O Mook-Kanamori; Marieke Niesters; Monique van Velzen; Maaike G J Gademan; Frits R Rosendaal; Marcel L Bouvy; Albert Dahan; Willem M Lijfering
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  What is a reasonable cost to refute a preposterous hypothesis?

Authors:  A W Castleberry; F W Grannis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.