Literature DB >> 3752574

Obstetric anesthesia: a national survey.

C P Gibbs, J Krischer, B M Peckham, H Sharp, T H Kirschbaum.   

Abstract

To assess obstetric anesthesia in the United States, and to determine why more anesthesia personnel are not involved in this subspecialty, a questionnaire was sent to the heads of obstetric and anesthesia services in 1,200 hospitals. Both obstetric and anesthesia respondents agreed on several characteristics of obstetric anesthesia that inhibit more participation by anesthesia personnel. Among others, they identified that: the unpredictability of labor and delivery makes scheduling difficult; obstetricians tend to dictate type and timing of anesthesia; the risk of malpractice claims is increased for obstetric anesthesia; and, finally, larger obstetric services would make it more practical to provide anesthesia services. Regarding availability of personnel and procedures, obstetric units with less than 500 deliveries per year were considerably more under-staffed than the larger units in most areas studied. When general anesthesia was used for cesarean section in these units, it was provided by, or given under the direction of, an anesthesiologist only 44% of the time, whereas in the hospitals with more than 1,500 deliveries per year, an anesthesiologist was present 86% of the time. Likewise, in the small units, personnel classified as "others" were responsible for newborn resuscitation in 24% and 43% of instances after cesarean section and vaginal delivery, respectively. In the hospitals with more than 1,500 deliveries, comparable figures were 4% and 2%, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3752574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  10 in total

1.  Standards of practice - the Canadian experience.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  Epidural analgesia and lactation.

Authors:  Mert Akbas; A Baris Akcan
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2011-04

3.  Obstetrical anaesthesia in Ontario.

Authors:  J Oyston
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 4.  Anaesthetists' role in neonatal resuscitation and care of the newborn.

Authors:  G W Ostheimer
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  The laryngeal mask airway--a consideration for the Neonatal Resuscitation Programme guidelines?

Authors:  J Brimacombe; A Berry
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Obstetric analgesia.

Authors:  J M Thistlewood
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Comparison of visceral pain incidence during cesarean section performed under spinal or epidural anesthesia.

Authors:  N Weksler; L Ovadia; A Stav; L Ribac
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 8.  Challenges and hurdles for patient safety in obstetric anesthesia in Japan.

Authors:  Nobuko Fujita; Naida M Cole; Yasuko Nagasaka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 9.  Local anaesthetic nerve block for pain management in labour.

Authors:  Natalia Novikova; Catherine Cluver
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-04-18

10.  The Effect of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone on Nausea and Vomiting under Spinal Anesthesia.

Authors:  Navid Kalani; Hasan Zabetian; Mohammad Sadegh Sanie; Mansour Deylami; Mohammad Radmehr; Reza Sahraei; Hossein Kargar Jahromi; Wesam Kooti
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2017-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.