Literature DB >> 3751934

Percutaneous pericardial catheter drainage: report of 42 consecutive cases.

S L Kopecky, J A Callahan, A J Tajik, J B Seward.   

Abstract

Test results of 42 consecutive patients with pericardial effusion treated with percutaneous pericardial drainage were analyzed. Intermittent (79%) or continuous (21%) drainage through a 60-cm pigtail catheter (No. 6Fr to 8Fr) was used. Clinical indications were urgent or semiurgent treatment of large (38%), life-threatening (24%), recurrent (21%) or acute (traumatic) (17%) pericardial effusion. Sixteen patients had a malignant cause for the effusion. Mean duration of use of the indwelling pericardial catheter was 3.5 days (range less than 1 day to 19 days). Two of the 9 catheters in patients on continuous drainage but only 1 of 33 catheters in patients on intermittent drainage became occluded. There was only 1 possible infective complication. Six patients had subsequent elective surgical intervention for persistent or recurrent effusion. Placement of an indwelling pericardial catheter guided by 2-dimensional echocardiography is safe and effective for initial treatment of selected pericardial effusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3751934     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90290-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  18 in total

1.  Pericardial Effusion and Tamponade.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  1999-06

Review 2.  Cardiac tamponade.

Authors:  J B Ball; W L Morrison
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Interventional Pericardiology.

Authors:  Mandeep Bhargava; Oussama M Wazni; Walid I Saliba
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Diagnosis and management of pericardial effusion.

Authors:  Jaume Sagristà-Sauleda; Axel Sarrias Mercé; Jordi Soler-Soler
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-26

5.  Thoracoscopic pericardial fenestration after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  M Brückner; D Schröder; M Brandt; F Fändrich; R Elfeldt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Percutaneous treatment in patients presenting with malignant cardiac tamponade.

Authors:  P Y Marcy; P Y Bondiau; P Brunner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Clinical experience with pericardiocentesis and extended drainage in a population with a high prevalence of HIV.

Authors:  V J Louw; H Reuter; J P Smedema; I Katjitae; L J Burgess; A F Doubell
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Management of pericardial effusion by drainage: a survey of 10 years' experience in a city centre general hospital serving a multiracial population.

Authors:  C R Gibbs; R D Watson; S P Singh; G Y Lip
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Pericardial tamponade and large pericardial effusions: causal factors and efficacy of percutaneous catheter drainage in 50 patients.

Authors:  Mehmet Kabukcu; Fatih Demircioglu; Ekrem Yanik; Ibrahim Basarici; Filiz Ersel
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2004

10.  Comparison of surgical pericardial drainage with percutaneous catheter drainage for pericardial effusion.

Authors:  Adam J Saltzman; Yehuda E Paz; A Garvey Rene; Philip Green; Ahmed Hassanin; Michael G Argenziano; Leroy Rabbani; George Dangas
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.