Literature DB >> 3749823

Circumcision for phimosis: a follow-up study.

A Stenram, G Malmfors, L Okmian.   

Abstract

All 117 boys circumcized for phimosis during one year at the Department of Pediatric Surgery in Lund were subject to a follow-up study five years postoperatively. In 45 cases the main operative indication was recurrent balanitis, in 25 cases scarring of the prepuce and in 41 cases an expressed ballooning at voiding. Early operative complications included 7 cases of postoperative haemorrhage which in 1 case necessitated reoperation. In 1 case there was a postoperative infection. 13/117 patients developed a stricture of the urethral orifice necessitating meatotomy. The study included a questionnaire which was answered by 97/117 patients, 92 of whom expressed complete satisfaction with the operation. The complaints of the others were cosmetic in nature. There was in no instance any sign of more severe psychological disorder than a certain shyness which was expressed in 8 cases. It is concluded that circumcision for phimosis in young boys is complicated by meatal stenosis in a certain frequency (13/117) but not loaded with serious complications. There seems to be no reason to fear psychological disturbances due to circumcision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3749823     DOI: 10.3109/00365598609040554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0036-5599


  7 in total

1.  Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect?

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Jake H Waskett; Ronald H Gray
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Comment 2: consent of children for non-therapeutic surgical procedures - general issues.

Authors:  Simon Bott
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Surgical management of meatal stenosis with meatoplasty.

Authors:  Ming-Hsien Wang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  A 'snip' in time: what is the best age to circumcise?

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Jake H Waskett; Joya Banerjee; Richard G Wamai; Aaron A R Tobian; Ronald H Gray; Stefan A Bailis; Robert C Bailey; Jeffrey D Klausner; Robin J Willcourt; Daniel T Halperin; Thomas E Wiswell; Adrian Mindel
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  CDC's Male Circumcision Recommendations Represent a Key Public Health Measure.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; John N Krieger; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2017-03-28

6.  Three-dimensional printing versus conventional machining in the creation of a meatal urethral dilator: development and mechanical testing.

Authors:  Michael Y Chen; Jacob Skewes; Ryan Daley; Maria A Woodruff; Nicholas J Rukin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Somatodendritic consistency check for temporal feature segmentation.

Authors:  Toshitake Asabuki; Tomoki Fukai
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.