Literature DB >> 3749661

Dependence of subjective traverse length on velocity of moving tactile stimuli.

B L Whitsel, O Franzen, D A Dreyer, M Hollins, M Young, G K Essick, C Wong.   

Abstract

Two series of experiments were performed to assess the effects of stimulus velocity on human subjects' perception of the distance traversed by a moving tactile stimulus. In all experiments, constant-velocity stimuli were applied to the dorsal surface of the left forearm; velocities ranging between 1.0 and 256 cm/sec were used. In some experiments the stimuli moved from distal to proximal over the skin, and in others they moved from proximal to distal. The length of skin contacted by the moving stimulus was defined by a plate having an aperture of 4.0 X 0.5 cm. In the first series of experiments, subjects were required to compare the distance traversed by a test stimulus delivered 2 sec after a standard stimulus, and also to report the on-locus and the off-locus of the brushing stimulus. In the second series of experiments, the subjects rated the perceived distance on the skin using a free-magnitude-estimation procedure. The data from both series of experiments defined the same relationship between stimulus velocity and perceived stimulus distance. More specifically, although the length of skin contacted by the stimulus was the same at all velocities, subjects' estimates of stimulus distance decreased with increasing stimulus velocity. In addition, the function relating estimates of stimulus distance to velocity was flat for velocities between 5 and 20 cm/sec, but possessed an appreciable negative slope at lower and higher velocities. It is interesting that the plateau of the relationship between perceived stimulus distance and velocity occurred within the range of velocities that human subjects employ to scan textured surfaces; it also corresponded precisely with the range of stimulus velocities at which the directional sensitivity of somatosensory cortical neurons and human subjects is optimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3749661     DOI: 10.3109/07367228609144583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Somatosens Res        ISSN: 0736-7244


  9 in total

1.  Velocity of motion across the skin influences perception of tactile location.

Authors:  Elizabeth H L Nguyen; Janet L Taylor; Jack Brooks; Tatjana Seizova-Cajic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Neural Basis of Touch and Proprioception in Primate Cortex.

Authors:  Benoit P Delhaye; Katie H Long; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 9.090

3.  Tactile motion lacks momentum.

Authors:  Gianluca Macauda; Bigna Lenggenhager; Rebekka Meier; Gregory Essick; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-08

4.  Tactile length contraction as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Jonathan Tong; Vy Ngo; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Real-Time Cerebral Hemodynamic Response to Tactile Somatosensory Stimulation.

Authors:  Benjamin Hage; Emily Way; Steven M Barlow; Gregory R Bashford
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  A Bayesian perceptual model replicates the cutaneous rabbit and other tactile spatiotemporal illusions.

Authors:  Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Somatosensory space abridged: rapid change in tactile localization using a motion stimulus.

Authors:  Tatjana Seizova-Cajic; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Neural encoding of saltatory pneumotactile velocity in human glabrous hand.

Authors:  Hyuntaek Oh; Rebecca Custead; Yingying Wang; Steven Barlow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Functional Connectivity Evoked by Orofacial Tactile Perception of Velocity.

Authors:  Yingying Wang; Fatima Sibaii; Rebecca Custead; Hyuntaek Oh; Steven M Barlow
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.