Literature DB >> 3746523

A quantitative-genetic analysis of hippocampal variation in the mouse.

W E Crusio, G Genthner-Grimm, H Schwegler.   

Abstract

This report analyses the genetic underpinnings of the proportions of the hippocampal terminal fields in the mouse at the midseptotemporal level. We used 5 inbred strains and all possible F1 crosses between them (diallel cross). Broad heritabilities ranged from 11 to 53%. Additive genetic variation was present for all phenotypes analyzed. Directional dominance was found for the relative size of the suprapyramidal mossy fiber terminal field only. For the stratum lacunosum-moleculare, ambidirectional dominance emerged. These findings suggest that, in evolutionary history, directional selection has operated for a proportionally large suprapyramidal terminal field. For all other hippocampal variables (viz. the relative sizes for the strata oriens, pyramidale, radiatum, lacunosum-moleculare, CA4, intra- and infrapyramidal mossy fiber terminal field and the absolute size of the regio inferior) past stabilizing selection was inferred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3746523     DOI: 10.3109/01677068609106850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurogenet        ISSN: 0167-7063            Impact factor:   1.250


  13 in total

1.  Complex trait analysis of the hippocampus: mapping and biometric analysis of two novel gene loci with specific effects on hippocampal structure in mice.

Authors:  L Lu; D C Airey; R W Williams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Comparison of the performance of DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice in transitive inference and foreground and background contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  Jessica M André; Kristy A Cordero; Thomas J Gould
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Selective breeding for extremes in open-field activity of mice entails a differentiation of hippocampal mossy fibers.

Authors:  Z Hausheer-Zarmakupi; D P Wolfer; M C Leisinger-Trigona; H P Lipp
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Hippocampal morphology in the inbred mouse strains NZB and CBA/H and their reciprocal congenics for the nonpseudoautosomal region of the Y chromosome.

Authors:  P V Guillot; F Sluyter; A Laghmouch; P L Roubertoux; W E Crusio
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 5.  Using genetically-defined rodent strains for the identification of hippocampal traits relevant for two-way avoidance behavior: a non-invasive approach.

Authors:  H P Lipp; H Schwegler; W E Crusio; D P Wolfer; M C Leisinger-Trigona; B Heimrich; P Driscoll
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1989-09-15

6.  Water-maze learning in the mouse correlates with variation in hippocampal morphology.

Authors:  H Schwegler; W E Crusio; H P Lipp; B Heimrich
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Females have a larger hippocampus than males in the brood-parasitic brown-headed cowbird.

Authors:  D F Sherry; M R Forbes; M Khurgel; G O Ivy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Nicotine withdrawal disrupts both foreground and background contextual fear conditioning but not pre-pulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Jessica M André; Danielle Gulick; George S Portugal; Thomas J Gould
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Systems genetic analysis of hippocampal neuroanatomy and spatial learning in mice.

Authors:  A Delprato; B Bonheur; M-P Algéo; P Rosay; L Lu; R W Williams; W E Crusio
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 3.449

10.  Structural correlates of active-staining following magnetic resonance microscopy in the mouse brain.

Authors:  Jon O Cleary; Frances K Wiseman; Francesca C Norris; Anthony N Price; Mankin Choy; Victor L J Tybulewicz; Roger J Ordidge; Sebastian Brandner; Elizabeth M C Fisher; Mark F Lythgoe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.