Literature DB >> 3746186

Money versus pain: experimental study of a conflict in humans.

M Cabanac.   

Abstract

Ten healthy human males volunteered to be subjects in an experiment in which they were to be paid to endure a painful sensation. This sensation was produced by isometric muscular contraction in the thighs. For each of six sessions the subjects received either a payment that was changed for each session (0.2, 0.5, 1.25, 3.125, 7.8125 French francs per 20 s) or a lump sum. At the beginning of a session, the subjects assumed a seated position against a wall, but without a seat, and the duration for which they could hold this position was the chief variable measured. Heart rate, blood pressure, and magnitude estimation of pain were also recorded periodically throughout each session. Pain was reported after a mean delay of 15 +/- 7 s (SE), and the magnitude estimates then increased linearly with time. The duration of maintaining the painful position increased linearly in relation to the logarithm of the increase in the amount of payment. Thus, utility of money decreased when pitted against pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3746186      PMCID: PMC1348254          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  [Circadian spontaneous variations of pain sensitivity of teeth].

Authors:  G Hildebrandt; L Pöllmann
Journal:  ZWR       Date:  1973-02-25

2.  Measurement of human pain.

Authors:  B B Wolff
Journal:  Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1980

Review 3.  The behavioural final common path.

Authors:  D J McFarland; R M Sibly
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1975-05-15       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  An experimental pain method sensitive to morphine in man: the submaximum effort tourniquet technique.

Authors:  G M Smith; L D Egbert; R A Markowitz; F Mosteller; H K Beecher
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  A study of fatigue during repetitive static work performed in two different segmental positions.

Authors:  J F Kahn; H Monod
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1984

6.  Physiological conflict in humans: fatigue vs. cold discomfort.

Authors:  M Cabanac; J Leblanc
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1983-05

7.  Human thermoregulatory behavior during a conflict between cold discomfort and money.

Authors:  K G Johnson; M Cabanac
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1983-01
  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Is it time to retire the A.V. Hill Model?: A rebuttal to the article by Professor Roy Shephard.

Authors:  Timothy D Noakes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The limit to exercise tolerance in humans: mind over muscle?

Authors:  Samuele Maria Marcora; Walter Staiano
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The Neuroscience of Goals and Behavior Change.

Authors:  Elliot T Berkman
Journal:  Consult Psychol J       Date:  2018-03

4.  Fatigue is a Brain-Derived Emotion that Regulates the Exercise Behavior to Ensure the Protection of Whole Body Homeostasis.

Authors:  Timothy David Noakes
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Pleasure in decision-making situations.

Authors:  Michel Cabanac; Jacqueline Guillaume; Marta Balasko; Adriana Fleury
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2002-05-29       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Does information about toughness decrease fighting? Experimental evidence.

Authors:  Aron Szekely; Diego Gambetta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Can contrast effects regulate emotions? A follow-up study of vital loss decisions.

Authors:  Qi Li; Yue Qi; Xianyun Liu; Jing Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Fatigue is a pain-the use of novel neurophysiological techniques to understand the fatigue-pain relationship.

Authors:  Alexis R Mauger
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Levels of valence.

Authors:  Vera Shuman; David Sander; Klaus R Scherer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.