| Literature DB >> 3745841 |
Abstract
Standard ethical approaches to decision-making which are based on rights, duties, obligations, beneficence, or best interests often seem inadequate or insufficient when applied to the individual infant, as in the case of Baby Jane Doe. A process approach which takes account of moral theory, but which allows tolerance, within limits, for a possible range of decisions, would appear to offer more reasonable decisions. However, any decision must be based on good facts and accurate prognosis. Pending the availability of medical records on Baby Jane Doe, judgment of the decisions made at Stony Brook must be suspended.Entities:
Keywords: Baby Jane Doe; Death and Euthanasia; Long Island
Mesh:
Year: 1986 PMID: 3745841 DOI: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Polit Policy Law ISSN: 0361-6878 Impact factor: 2.265